UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

or

For the transition period from ______ to  ______.

Commission File Number: 33-1155965

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ¨  No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes  ¨  No  x

As of June 16, 2015: 79,255,955 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value were issued and outstanding.

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

September 30, 2014

INDEX

PART I- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

September 30, 2014

Index to Financial Statements

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

September 30, 2014

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Car Charging Group Inc. (“CCGI”) was incorporated on October 3, 2006 under the laws of the State of Nevada as New Image Concepts, Inc. On November 20, 2009, New Image Concepts, Inc. changed its name to Car Charging Group, Inc.

Pursuant to its business plan, CCGI through its wholly owned subsidiaries, acquires and installs EV charging stations, and shares servicing fees received from customers that use the charging stations with the property owner(s), on a property by property basis. Additionally, CCGI through its wholly owned subsidiaries sells hardware to others and enters into individual arrangements for this purpose with various property owners, which may include municipalities, garage operators, hospitals, multi- family properties, shopping-malls and facility owner/operators.

Through September 30, 2014, CCGI and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Car Charging”) has incurred an accumulated deficiency since inception of $60,944,253.   At September 30, 2014, the Company had a cash balance of $152,924.   The Company has incurred additional losses subsequent to September 30, 2014.  The Company implemented cost reduction measures in December 2014 to help reduce employee headcount, inventory and other operating expenditures.  At June 16, 2015, the Company had a cash balance of approximately $229,000.

LIQUIDITY

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain investors (the “Purchasers”) for an aggregate of $6,000,000 (the “Aggregate Subscription Amount”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued the following to the Purchasers: (i) 60,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock convertible into 8,571,429 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of 8,571,429 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrant Shares”) for an exercise price of $1.00 per share.

The release of the Aggregate Subscription Amount to the Company is subject to the Company meeting certain milestones. On December 23, 2014, all the initial closing conditions were met so the Company received Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) of the Aggregate Subscription Amount. The remaining Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) was deposited into an escrow account. If the first set of milestones is achieved on or before March 31, 2015, the Company will receive Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) from the escrow proceeds. The remaining Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) will be released from escrow based on whether or not the second set of milestones is achieved on or before June 30, 2015.

If the milestones are not achieved on or before July 31, 2015 then the amounts remaining in escrow will be returned to the Purchasers, pro rata based upon the relative cash contributions. Although the milestones, as defined were not met, the investors released $4,000,000 as of June 15, 2015 in consideration of the formation of an Operations and Finance Committee (“OPFIN Committee”) to provide the Company with financial and operational direction, management and oversight with respect to the Company’s operating plan and fiscal year 2015 revised budget and to oversee progress.

The Company expects that through the next 12 months from the date of this filing, capital requirements to fund the Company’s growth and to cover its operating costs will consume all of the cash flows that it expects to generate from its operations as well as proceeds from the equity issuance noted above. The Company believes that during this period, while the Company is focusing on the growth and expansion of its business, the gross profit that it expects to generate from operations will not be sufficient to cover anticipated operating costs. Accordingly, the Company may require external funding to sustain operations and to follow through on the execution of its business plan. However, there can be no assurance that the Company’s plans will materialize and/or that the Company will be successful in funding estimated cash shortfalls through additional debt or equity capital and through the cash generated by the Company’s operations. Given these conditions, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon it being able to secure an adequate amount of debt or equity capital to enable it to meet its cash requirements. In addition, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered by entrants into established markets, the competitive environment in which the Company operates and the current capital raising environment.

Since inception, the Company’s operations have primarily been funded through proceeds from equity and debt financings. Although management believes that the Company has access to capital resources, there are currently no other commitments in place for new financing at this time, and there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain funds on commercially acceptable terms, if at all.

The Company intends to raise additional funds during the next twelve months. The additional capital raised would be used to fund the Company’s operations. The current level of cash and operating margins is insufficient to cover the existing fixed and variable obligations of the Company, so increased revenue performance and the addition of capital through issuances of securities are critical to the Company’s success. Should the Company not be able to raise additional debt or equity capital through a private placement or some other financing source, the Company would take one or more of the following actions to conserve cash: further reductions in employee headcount, reduction in base salaries to senior executives and employees, and other cost reduction measures. Assuming that the Company is successful in its plans and development efforts, the Company believes that it will be able to raise additional debt or equity capital. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise such additional funds on acceptable terms, if at all.

These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should it be unable to continue as a going concern.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to represent a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on May 5, 2014.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CCGI and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Car Charging, Inc., Beam Charging LLC (“Beam”), EV Pass LLC, and Blink Network LLC (“Blink”). Beam was acquired on February 26, 2013, EV Pass LLC was acquired on April 3, 2013, 350 Green was acquired on April 22, 2013 and Blink was acquired on October 16, 2013 as a result of an asset purchase agreement with Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation of America (“ECOtality”). Accordingly, the operating results of these businesses are included from their respective acquisition dates. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The consolidation guidance relating to accounting for Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”) requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity and perform ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. As more fully described in Note 5, the Company determined that it is the primary beneficiary of 350 Green LLC (“350 Green”), and as such, 350 Green’s assets, liabilities and results of operations are included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

USE OF ESTIMATES

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, together with amounts disclosed in the related notes to the financial statements. Significant estimates used in these financial statements include, but are not limited to, equity compensation, warranty reserves, inventory valuations, deferred tax valuation allowances, intangible assets, goodwill and estimates of future electric car sales and the effects thereon the economic useful lives of long-lived assets. Estimates and judgments are based on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected.

RESTRICTED CASH

At September 30, 2014, the Company had a $210,671 certificate of deposit at a financial institution which served as collateral for a letter of credit as a landlord’s security deposit for pending rental of current and additional office space, currently in negotiations, in Miami Beach, Florida. The negotiations between the landlord and the Company have terminated and the certificate of deposit matured in October 2014.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable are carried at their contractual amounts, less an estimate for uncollectible amounts. Management estimates the allowance for bad debts based on existing economic conditions, the financial conditions of the customers, and the amount and the age of past due accounts. Receivables are considered past due if full payment is not received by the contractual due date. Past due accounts are generally written off against the allowance for bad debts only after all collection attempts have been exhausted. There is no collateral held by the Company for accounts receivable nor does any accounts receivable serve as collateral for any of the Company’s borrowings.

INVENTORIES

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company writes down inventory for potentially excess and obsolete items after evaluating historical sales, future demand, market conditions and expected product life cycles to reduce inventory to its estimated net realizable value. Such provisions are made in the normal course of business and charged to cost of goods sold in the statement of operations as deemed necessary. Future demand or market conditions are solely based on the Company’s projections of future electric car sales and the related demand for its products and services. Due to the nascent stage of the electric car charging industry, the Company has determined that inventory write-downs are not required at this time. If future inventory write-downs would be required, they would be reflected in costs of goods sold in the period the revision is made. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory would be established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances would not result in the restoration or increase to that newly established cost basis.

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, inventory was comprised solely of electric charging stations and related parts that are available for sale or warranty requirements.

FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as set forth in the table below.

When fixed assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations for the respective period. Minor additions and repairs are expensed in the period incurred. Major additions and repairs which extend the useful life of existing assets are capitalized and depreciated on a straight line basis over their remaining estimated useful lives.

ELECTRIC VEHICLE (“EV”) CHARGING STATIONS

EV charging stations represents the depreciable cost of charging devices that have been installed on the premises of participating owner/operator properties or are earmarked to be installed. Upon sale, replacement or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company held approximately $154,000 and $1,135,000 in EV charging stations that were not placed in service as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

The Company will begin depreciating this equipment when installation is substantially complete. In conjunction with the acquisition of Blink in October 2013, the Company’s management determined that the Company is no longer a development stage company as it has established the business and corresponding revenue generating opportunities through its principal operations. EV charging station depreciation, formerly classified as general and administrative expenses is now classified as cost of revenues. Depreciation expense pertaining to EV charging stations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 is $699,374 and $2,145,608, respectively. EV charging station depreciation of $590,686 and $1,195,445 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was recorded in general and administrative expenses.

SOFTWARE

Amortization expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 pertaining to network software was $40,031 and $88,848 respectively and is recorded as cost of revenue. There was no amortization expense pertaining to network software for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Non network software amortization for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $2,486 and $11,881, $7,460 and $9,395 respectively.

OFFICE AND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT

Depreciation expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $1,444 $16,095, $11,889 and $32,041, respectively.

AUTOMOBILES

The Company operates seven electrically-charged enabled automobiles. Depreciation expense for the three months ended and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $14,098, $5,735, $38,864 and $17,204, respectively.

MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT

Depreciation expense classified as cost of revenue for the three months ended and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $2,980, $0, $8,939 and $0, respectively.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company’s long-lived assets, which include EV charging stations, office and computer equipment, automobiles, machinery and equipment, network software and finite lived intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.

As the industry is in its nascent stages and heavily dependent upon electric vehicle car sales, the Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by monitoring current selling prices of car charging units in the open market, the adoption rate of various auto manufacturers in the electric vehicle market and projected car charging utilization at various public car charging stations throughout its network in determining fair value. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

GOODWILL

Goodwill represents the premium paid over the fair value of the intangible and net tangible assets acquired in business combinations. The Company is required to assess the carrying value of its reporting units that contain goodwill at least on an annual basis. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgments including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for the businesses, the useful life over which cash flows will occur, and determination of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or conclusions on goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. On April 17, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the formation of a Trust Mortgage, a binding contract between 350 Green and a trustee, to serve as fiduciary for the benefit of all creditors of 350 Green, whereby 350 Green confers upon the trustee the authority and power to manage the operations and assets of the business in a manner that will maximize recovery for 350 Green’s creditors. The Trust Mortgage and the acts of the trustee are not binding upon the creditors of 350 Green. As a result of this event, the Company’s management had reassessed the carrying value of the goodwill related to the 350 Green acquisition, $3,299,379, and determined that it had been fully impaired and is included as an operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. As further described in Note 6-Impairment of and Losses of Long Lived Assets, the Company’s management had reassessed the carrying value of the goodwill related to the Beam Charging LLC (“Beam Charging”) acquisition, $1,601,882, and determined that it too had also been fully impaired and is included as an operating expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The Company evaluates its convertible debt, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Topic 815 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date or as triggering events occur and recorded as a liability. The change in fair value is recorded in the Statement of Operations as a component of other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Level 2 inputs are inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, deposits and advanced commissions, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s notes payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

The Company revalues its warrants payable to the former members of Beam and the warrants to investors who were issued warrants and warrant units in conjunction with stock sales during the fourth quarter of 2013 and at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the these liabilities. The Company has no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The development and determination of the unobservable input for Level 3 fair value measurements and the fair value calculation are the responsibility of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and approved by the Chief Executive Officer.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company applies Topic 605 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Accordingly, when a customer completes use of a charging station, the service can be deemed rendered and revenue may be recognized based on the time duration of the session or kilowatt hours drawn during the session. Sales of EV stations are recognized upon shipment to the customer, F.O.B. shipping point, the point of customer acceptance.

Governmental grants and rebates pertaining to revenues and periodic expenses are recognized as income when the related revenue and/or periodic expense are recorded. Government grants and rebates related to EV charging stations and their installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the related depreciation expense of the related asset over their useful lives.

RECLASSIFICATION

As a result of the Company emergence from a developmental stage company, EV charging station depreciation and Blink network software amortization, formerly classified as general and administrative expenses are now classified as cost of revenues in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended and the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was recorded as general and administrative expenses as the Company was still in the developmental stage. Additionally, the assets and liabilities of 350 Green have been separately presented on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (see Note 5).

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 Employee

Stock based awards granted to employees have been accounted for as required by Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC topic 718”). Under ASC topic 718 stock based awards are valued at fair value on the date of grant, and that fair value is recognized over the requisite service period. The Company values its stock based awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.

Non-Employee

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Topic 505 section 50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Section 505-50”). Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. The equity instrument is remeasured each reporting period until a measurement date is reached.

INCOME TAXES

The Company follows Topic 740 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, (“ASC Section 740”) which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date. As of September 30, 2014, the Company maintained a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets since it is more likely than not that the future tax benefit on such temporary differences will not be realized.

ASC Section 740 also addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC Section 740, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain income tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement by examining taxing authorities. ASC Section 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, between interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company has open tax years going back to 2011 which may be subject to audit by federal and state authorities. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on uncertain income tax positions in interest expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to Topic 260 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period.

The following table shows the number of potentially outstanding dilutive shares excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, as they were anti-dilutive.

The above warrants include warrants to purchase 31,000 and 117,587 shares of the Company’s common stock contingently issuable to the former members of Beam as of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively. The 31,000 warrants issuable at September 30, 2014 were issued on October 3, 2014.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company follows Topic 450 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company operates in only one segment - public electric vehicle charging services at locations throughout the United States. Accordingly, segment related information is not reported in the Current Report on Form 10-Q.

 RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), which creates Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, ASU 2014-09 supersedes the cost guidance in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition—Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and creates new Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs— Contracts with Customers. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, ASU 2014-09 requires enhanced financial statement disclosures over revenue recognition as part of the new accounting guidance. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, and early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2014-09 and assessing the impact, if any, it may have on its financial position and results of operations.

In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014–12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), which clarifies accounting for share–based payments for which the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. That is the case when an employee is eligible to retire or otherwise terminate employment before the end of the period in which a performance target could be achieved and still be eligible to vest in the award if and when the performance target is achieved. The updated guidance clarifies that such a term should be treated as a performance condition that affects vesting. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant–date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The guidance will be effective for the annual periods (and interim periods therein) ending after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014–12 on the financial statements.

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014–15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern. The Update provides U.S. GAAP guidance on management’s responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and about related footnote disclosures. For each reporting period, management will be required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the financial statements are issued. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2013–300—Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Going Concern Presumption, which has been deleted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014–15 on the financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-16 (Topic 815) - Derivatives and Hedging, which provides clarification on how current guidance should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. Specifically, the amendments clarify that an entity should consider all relevant terms and features in evaluating the host contract and that no single term or feature would necessarily determine the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract. ASU 2014-16 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The amendment should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the year for which the amendments are effective. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014–15 on the financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The update requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of being presented as an asset. Debt disclosures will include the face amount of the debt liability and the effective interest rate. The update requires retrospective application and represents a change in accounting principle. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The adoption of this statement will impact future presentation and disclosures of the financial statements.

Management does not believe that these or any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Accounts and other receivables consist of the following as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

ECOtality

The amount due from the estate of ECOtality of $94,035 at September 30, 2014 consists of Blink revenue received by the estate for charging services rendered after the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement with the estate offset by expenses paid by the estate on behalf of the Company. This amount due from the estate of Ecotality was subsequently forgiven as part of the consideration to acquire a 49.9% stake in the reorganized Ecotalilty as more fully described in Note 19 – Subsequent Events.

Accounts receivable- Charging revenues

The receivable represents amounts due from the Company’s credit card processor as a result of drivers of electric vehicles paying to charge their cars by credit card.

Nissan North America – No Charge to Charge

The Company, on June 30, 2014, and other providers of Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (“EVSE”) services (collectively “EVSE Providers”) entered into agreement to provide free electric charging to purchasers of Nissan Leafs in certain markets in the United States commencing in July 2014. Nissan pays the EVSE Providers a fixed monthly amount per Nissan Leaf purchaser for a two year period. The receivable balance at September 30, 2014 represents the Company’s share of the Nissan EVSE Provider payments for the service months of July 2014 through September 2014 which were paid in full in October 2014.

Prepaid and other current assets consist of the following at:

On December 6, 2012, the Company retained an individual to serve as chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors for three years. As part of the chairman’s compensation, the Company issued to him 200,000 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $316,000 which is based on the market value on the date of issuance. As of September 30, 2014, the prepaid portion of the compensation was $126,107. The expense is being recognized ratably over the term of the agreement.

On February 5, 2013, the Company entered into a binding memorandum of understanding with a firm to develop application software. As part of its fee, the firm was issued 113,636 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.32 per share based on the market price on the date of issuance totaling $150,000.  The Company introduced the application in the commercial market in May 2014 and anticipates an estimated useful life of one year to be recognized ratably over the year. As of September 30, 2014, the prepaid portion was $85,000.

In May 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with a firm to convert 500 pole unit EVSEs into 500 wall unit chargers. The prepaid amount for inventory conversion costs represents a 50% prepayment to the firm for the work to be performed which is contemplated to be completed by September 2015.

In September 2014, the Company entered intent into a letter of intent (“LOI”) with a host to assume license agreements from 350 Green at various host locations throughout the United States. As part of the LOI, the Company is obligated to pay the host $113,111 for past amounts due to them by 350 Green through August 31, 2014, which is due to the host as of December 15, 2014 and is recorded in cost of revenues in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations as of September 30, 2014. The Company made the December payment on December 26, 2014. Additionally, the LOI required the Company to pay the host a fixed annual, beginning September 1, 2014, rent in advance in the amount of $42,349 on September 1, 2014 and to sign amended and restated host agreements. As of September 30, 2014, $38,630 is prepaid. On February 27, 2015 the Company paid $42,349.

The Company had been continuously negotiating with the 350 Green creditors in an attempt to reduce 350 Green’s liabilities. On April 17, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors executed a resolution to form a Trust Mortgage relating to 350 Green. A Trust Mortgage is a non-judicial vehicle for the reorganization and the debt restructuring or the sale or wind down of 350 Green and a liquidation of its assets under the control of a third party trustee. It is similar in intent to an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors under applicable state law but unlike an Assignment or a liquidation under the United States Bankruptcy Code, the Trust Mortgage is not governed by statute except to the extent of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as it relates to the grant of a security interest by the Company to the trustee.

The Trust Mortgage is a binding contract between 350 Green and the trustee, but not binding upon the creditors of 350 Green, to serve as fiduciary for the benefit of all creditors of 350 Green, whereby 350 Green confers upon the trustee the authority and power to manage the operations and assets of the business in a manner that will maximize recovery for 350 Green’s creditors.

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of 350 Green as of September 30, 2014 and as of December 31, 2013.

Accrued expenses as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consisted of the following

Note Payable

In conjunction with the acquisition of 350 Green, the Company also assumed a note payable to a law firm in the amount of $105,000 with interest at 5% per annum collateralized by 28 installed charging stations with payments of $10,500 per month to be paid in full as of December 31, 2013. In July 2014, the Company had paid the note and accrued interest in full.

On May 29, 2014, EVSE Management LLC (“EVSE”) a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a Management Services Agreement whereby EVSE would administer the contracts, including the servicing of the related charging stations, of 350 Green on behalf of the trustee in consideration of the revenues derived from such charging stations until the sale of the charging stations or notice from the Company to terminate the Management Services Agreement. No revenues were earned by EVSE during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 from the charging stations noted above. In addition, 350 Green and the trustee did not pay or incur any liability to CCGI or any of its subsidiaries during the period of April 17, 2014 through September 30, 2014. On June 27, 2014, EVSE entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with the trustee of the Trust Mortgage and 350 Green to purchase from 350 Green (a) charging stations associated with contracts, together with any and all other grants, credits, licenses, and rights associated with them, (b) uninstalled car charging stations that may be in the possession of 350 Green creditors, (c) 350 Green charging stations in various stages of installation and (d) other assets in consideration of $860,836 consisting of the following:

(1) In July 2014, $31,760 was paid and the remaining $283,138 payable in four equal installments on the four succeeding anniversary dates of the Agreement. Interest on the unpaid portion of the debt accrues at the rate of 100 basis points above the prime rate published by Bank of America on the date of the agreement and is payable with the last anniversary payment and (c) cash of $53,189. The $200,000 paid to the trustee is recorded as general and administrative expenses-professional fees as the trustee incurred expenses of said amount as of September 30, 2014.

On September 30, 2014, the Company had assigned its 100% membership interest in 350 Green to Green 350 Mortgage Trust LLC, an independent third party, of which the trustee of 350 Green is a member, for $100. Green 350 Mortgage Trust accepted the assignment so that if necessary, it could undertake an assignment for the benefit of creditors of 350 Green or if necessary, commence a bankruptcy action. The Company entered into an agreement on September 8, 2014, among the trustee of 350 Green, an attorney, 350 Green and the Company whereby the Company would pay the legal fees incurred in connection with an action brought by 350 Green against a third party. In the event 350 Green prevailed in its action, the charging stations restored to 350 Green would become the property of the Company to the extent of the amount of the legal fees incurred by the Company. In the event 350 Green did not prevail in its action, the Company would have the right to offset the amounts expended against the secured note payable. The matter has been heard however no ruling has been received as of June 16, 2015.

The Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of 350 Green due to the subordinated financing arrangements as well as being the primary beneficiary in the outcome of the action against JNS, and as such, 350 Green’s assets, liabilities and results of operations are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

The amounts included in the condensed consolidated statement of operations pertaining to 350 Green for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, are as follows:

Impairment of Assets

The Company has sustained operating and cash flow losses since inception through the quarter ended September 30, 2014 forming a basis for performing an impairment test of its electric charger fixed asset group in accordance with ASC 360-10-Impairment and Disposal of Long Lived Assets. The asset group was determined to be on a state basis as the overwhelming majority of chargers were deployed in major metropolitan areas of heavily populated states that encouraged “green” public policy. Furthermore, the chargers in those areas had a symbiotic relationship to one another as they provided alternative charging sources within a concentrated area. The Company performed a recoverability test on these chargers and for the chargers which failed the test, measured and recorded an impairment charge as applicable. The key assumptions used in the estimates of projected cash flows utilized in both the test and measurement steps of the impairment analysis were projected revenues and related host payments. These forecasts were based on actual revenues for the eight months ended May 31, 2014 and take into account recent developments as well as the Company's plans and intentions. These inputs are considered level 3 in the fair value hierarchy (See Note 2). Based upon the results of the discounted cash flow analysis, the Company recorded an impairment charge on certain chargers of  $631,011 during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 representing the excess of net book value as of September 30, 2014 over the fair value of the related chargers.

On April 2, 2015, the Company was notified by a host to remove 304 level 2 charging stations from its various locations throughout the United States, installed by 350 Green prior to the Company’s acquisition of 350 Green and currently owned by EVSE. The customer alleged material breaches by 350 Green of the Charging Station License Agreement between the parties. As a result of the notification, the Company performed an impairment test on the related charging stations and concluded the stations were fully impaired resulting in an impairment charge of $333,974, the net book value of the charging stations as of September 30, 2014.

Abandonment of Assets

In conjunction with the acquisition of 350 Green in April 2013, the Company acquired $298,322 of charger deployments in progress at various locations throughout the United States. The stages of completion varied however none were of imminent deployment. During the quarter ended September 30, 2014, the Company’s management decided that it was not going to move forward in completing deployment of any of these locations as nothing had been done at these locations since acquisition and the site conditions was determined not to be feasible. Accordingly, the Company recorded an operating expense impairment charge of $298,322 during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 from abandonment of these assets.

Loss of Title of Assets

In conjunction with the acquisition of assets the Blink Network on October 16, 2013, we acquired approximately 4,300 chargers. All of the chargers were funded under a grant from United States Department of Energy (“DOE”). The contracts entered into by Ecotality (the owner of the Blink Network) generally stipulated that title to the chargers rested with Ecotality until such time as the DOE grant terminated (originally scheduled as December 31, 2013). As described in Note 9- Accrued U.S, Department of Energy Fee, the Company sought to novate the DOE grant (“grant”) to step in the shoes of Ecotality and fulfill its obligations and receive any remaining funds available under the terms of the grant. In the meantime, the Company sought to convert the old Ecotality contracts with the hosts into new contracts with the Company and among other things, gain ownership of the chargers. On August 8, 2014, the Company was apprised by the DOE that it would not novate the grant. The Company undertook the task of determining which hosts did not convert their contracts. Upon completion of the task, the Company had determined that 2,813 Level 2 chargers with a net book value of $1,276,749 at September 30, 2014 and 38 DCFC’s with a net book value of $314,366 were owned by their respective hosts. The Company recorded charge to operating expenses of $1,591,115 of net book value at September 30, 2014 pertaining to chargers whose title was lost as result of the DOE grant not being novated during the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

Intangible assets were acquired in conjunction with the acquisitions of Beam, EV Pass, and Blink during 2013 and were recorded at their fair value at such time. Trademarks are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful life of ten years. Patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the patent (twenty years or less), commencing when the patent is approved and placed in service on a straight line basis. Awarded government contracts are amortized over and in proportion to the collection period (18 months or less) of the grant. The awarded government contracts (New York State Energy Resources and Development Authority) expire on June 30, 2015 and the Company is seeking an extension from the grantor.

In connection with the Blink acquisition, the Company acquired certain trademarks related to the Blink charging network and certain technological patents relating to electric vehicle charging equipment. In connection with the acquisition of Beam, the Company acquired awarded government contracts. These intangible assets were capitalized at their estimated fair values at the respective dates of acquisition and are being amortized over their remaining estimated useful lives.

Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $22,841, $26,277, $286,497 and $154,091 respectively.

Based on the intangible assets recorded at September 30, 2014, and assuming no subsequent impairment of the underlying assets, annual amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be as follows:

Accrued expenses consisted of the following at:

Consulting Fees

Accrued consulting fees represent contractual obligations to issue either shares of the Company’s common stock and or cash to consultants for services rendered. The Company is currently contesting whether the consultants performed in accordance with terms of their respective contracts and therefore has not issued the shares nor paid for the services.

Taxes Payable

Accrued taxes payable consist of accrued sales and use, personal property and other miscellaneous taxes.

Warranty

The Company provides a limited product warranty against defects in materials and workmanship for its Blink residential and commercial chargers, ranging in length from one to two years. The Company accrues for estimated warranty costs at the time of revenue recognition and records the expense of such accrued liabilities as a component of cost of sales. Estimated warranty costs are based on historical product data and anticipated future costs. Should actual failure rates differ significantly from estimates, the impact of these unforeseen costs would be recorded as a change in estimate in the period identified. The change in the carrying amount of accrued warranty liability, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is as follows:

No warranty costs were incurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 nor the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Warranty expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $0 and $438,076, respectively.

Accrued Public Information Fee

In accordance with the Stock Purchase Agreements (“SPA”) of October 11, 2013 and December 9, 2013, the Company was required to be compliant with Rule 144(c)(1) of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as defined, so as to enable investors to sell their holdings of Company shares in accordance with the SPA. In the event of the Company’s noncompliance with Rule 144(c)(1), the investors are entitled to receive a cash fee of one per cent of the aggregate subscription amount of the purchaser’s securities for every 30 day period that the Company is not in compliance. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has accrued $72,667 of fees. No fees have been paid as of June 16, 2015.

Accrued Host Fees

Accrued host fees represent amounts due to hosts for revenue share and electricity reimbursement in accordance with their respective agreements with the Company.

Fees

Accrued fees consist of professional, board of director, network fees and other miscellaneous fees.

In conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) grant, the DOE owns 51% of all property reimbursed under the terms of the grant with a fair value in excess of $5,000 but allows for the grantee to purchase the DOE’s share at the end of the grant. The DOE grant was under novation negotiations and terminated as of December 31, 2013. On August 8, 2014, the DOE notified the Company that it would not novate the DOE grant. On September 2, 2014, the Company was notified by DOE that DOE had no property interest in the 93 DC fast chargers in the Company’s inventory resulting in a release from liability to the DOE of $482,611.

Additionally, the DOE notified the Company that it continues to have a property interest in the 107 installed DC fast chargers if the fair market value of each DC fast charger had a market value in excess of $5,000 on October 16, 2013, the date of the Blink purchase agreement approved by the bankruptcy court. The DOE requested documentation describing the data, assumption and methodologies that the Company used to determine the value as of the closing date. The Company provided the DOE with additional documentation and calculations supporting its belief that each DC fast charger acquired as of the closing date of the Blink purchase agreement approved by the bankruptcy court had a fair market value of less than $5,000. On May 5, 2015 the DOE notified the Company that it had reviewed the Company’s fair market value analysis of DC fast chargers procured and installed under the grant at the time of closing, which indicated that the fair market value per unit of the DC fast chargers was less than $5,000. The DOE concurred with the Company’s analysis and had determined that the DOE’s interest in the DCfast chargers was extinguished. The Company will reverse the accrued liability in the second quarter of 2015 comensurate with the date of the DOE notification.

In connection with the sale of the Company’s stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2013, the Company sold 17,785,714 shares of its common stock and issued 17,785,714 warrants for gross proceeds of $15,450,000. In conjunction with these sales, the Company also issued 112,000 shares of common stock, 988,000 warrant units (each unit consisting of (1) a warrant to purchase a common share at $1.00 and (2) a warrant to purchase a common share at $1.05, and 112,000 warrants to placement agents valued at $68,755 with an exercise price of $1.05 exercisable for a five year period. The exercise price is subject to a full ratchet reset feature in the event of a dilutive issuance as defined. The fair value of the warrant granted, was estimated on the date of grant, using the multinomial lattice valuation model, using a volatility factor of 90.15%, a term of five years, a risk fee interest rate of 0.64% and a zero dividend yield. The Company granted the purchasers and the placement agents registration rights on both the shares and the underlying shares related to the warrants within 60 days of the date of the sale of the stock, as amended. The stock purchase agreement provided for a penalty provision imposed upon the Company of 1% of the gross proceeds per month for each month that the shares are not registered not to exceed 10%. As of February 9, 2014, the amended 60 day threshold, the Company had not filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) but subsequently filed on February 18, 2014 and amended its filing on May 13, 2014. The SEC notified the Company that it could not review its registration statement until such time as the Company furnished two years of audited financial statements of 350 Green and ECOtality as the acquisitions were deemed significant. The Company sought a waiver of the audit requirement but was denied by SEC. As a result, the Company has accrued a liability for the maximum penalty amount as it cannot be determined when the registration statement will become effective but does not believe at this time that it is probable that it will be effective before the maximum penalty is reached. The Company has also accrued interest in the amount of $117,335 through September 30, 2014 at the rate of 18% per annum simple interest in accordance with the terms of the registration rights agreement. .

On February 5, 2015, the holders of a majority of the shares affected by the registration rights penalty granted the Company the option to satisfy the accrued registration rights penalty and related interest as of December 23, 2014 totaling $1,726,336 in Series C Convertible Preferred Shares with a stated value of $100 in lieu of cash. The Company elected this option which required the Company to pay a 20% premium causing the liability to increase to $1,854,000, exclusive of interest of $140,802, resulting in a charge to operations of $311,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. Incremental interest expense as of September 30, 2014 as a result of the Company’s election totaled $23,467. As of April 10, 2015, the Company issued 20,414 Series C Convertible Preferred shares of Stock representing substantially all of the value of the registration rights penalty and accrued interest thereon through December 23, 2014.

In conjunction with the Beam acquisition, the agreement provided for an anti-dilution benefit to former members of Beam whereby until such time as a former member sells or disposes of all of his CCGI common stock, any Triggering Event, as defined by the Agreement, whereby the issue price of the Company stock is below $1.58 shall cause the Company to issue a warrant to each former member to purchase an additional number of Company common shares at the Triggering Event price so as to preserve such Beam Member’s pre-Triggering Event percentage ownership in the Company. The Company has recorded warrants payable and a provision for warrants payable for warrants that are required to be issued based on the Triggering Events occurring during the period of February 26, 2013 through September 30, 2014. The Company estimated the warrants payable using the Black Scholes model and recorded the fair value as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The measurement is based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market, which Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” of the FASB Accounting Standards Code refers to as Level 3 inputs. The warrants payable balance at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $10,911 and $1,216,000 respectively. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company changed significant estimates used to calculate the fair value of these warrants including the term, the impact of Beam member stock sales and the impact thereof on their subsequent percentage of ownership on a prospective basis and changes to percentage of ownership on a fully diluted basis. The following table reflects the activity of the warrant payable for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014:

On August 8, 2014, the Company issued 714,209 warrants to the former Beam members, payable as of June 30, 2014, at a fair value estimated at $247,800. As of September 30, 2014, warrants to purchase an additional 31,000 shares are required to be issued based on triggering events during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 valued at $10,911, using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the following assumptions: (1) an expected volatility of 84% based on historical volatility; (2) an interest rate of 0.13%; 3) an expected life of one year and (4) a zero dividend yield. The stock price was determined based on the closing market price on the date of the grant. These warrants were issued by the Company on October 3, 2014. 

In connection with the purchase of an electrically charged enabled automobile by the Company in the first quarter, of 2012, the Company entered into a financing agreement. The five-year note, collateralized by the related asset, bears interest at 4.75% and requires minimum monthly payments, inclusive of interest, of $1,216 commencing in May 2012. The unpaid principal balance of the note as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $35,365 and $44,836, respectively.

In May 2012, an individual lent Beam $10,000, payable on demand at no interest and personally guaranteed by the then President of Beam. The debt remains unpaid as of September 30, 2014.

In conjunction with the acquisition of EV Pass in April 2013, the Company issued a non interest bearing $75,000 note, to be paid in three equal installments of $25,000 on each subsequent three month anniversary date of the note. The note was scheduled to be paid in full by November 3, 2013. The July 2013 payment was made in October 2013. The Company has not made any additional payments as of September 30, 2014 and the unpaid balance was $50,000. The parties have reached an agreement as detailed in Note 18 –Commitments and contingencies.

In conjunction with the acquisition of 350 Green, the Company issued a non interest bearing note to the former members of 350 Green in the amount of $500,000 requiring a $10,000 payment at closing, a subsequent monthly payment of $10,000 and monthly payments of $20,000 thereafter until such time as the note is paid in full, circa May 2015. The Company imputed an interest rate of 12% to the note and recorded the debt at its present value on the date of issuance of $444,768. The Company has paid $140,000 in aggregate principal and interest as of September 30, 2014. The Company has not made any payments since November 2013 and is currently in default. The parties are currently in litigation as detailed in Note 17. The unpaid principal balance of the note at September 30, 2014 is $327,967 and the accrued interest as of September 30, 2014 is $28,348.

Future minimum monthly note payments, exclusive of interest, by year as of September 30, 2014 are as follows:

Interest expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $108,783, $16,729, $154,651 and $38,213 respectively.

The Company is the recipient of various governmental grants, rebates and marketing incentives. Reimbursements of periodic expenses are recognized as income when the related expense is incurred. Government grants and rebates related to EV charging stations and their installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the recognition of the related depreciation expense of the related asset over their useful lives.

The Company entered into a joint marketing agreement with Nissan North America (“Nissan”) for which among other matters requires the Company to build, own, operate and maintain a network of 48 fast chargers throughout the United States and create an auto dealer network promotion and referral program so as to facilitate sales of electric vehicles to their potential customers. Payments received under the agreement on March 29, 2013 of $782,880 were deferred and are being recognized ratably over the life of the chargers as they are installed. The Company identified the obligation to install and maintain the chargers and the obligation to create a referral and promotion program as separate elements under the agreement but determined that they did not qualify as separate units of accounting for purposes of recognizing revenue. The multiple deliverables are not separate units of accounting because Nissan North America has not delineated specific amounts of the revenue to particular elements of the agreement and the Company is unable to estimate the fair value or the selling price of the respective deliverables. The Company has installed seven units as of September 30, 2014 and is required to create an auto dealer network promotion and referral program and to install the remainder of the network by December 31, 2014, as extended. Additionally, the Company sold five fast chargers during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 for which Nissan North America has reduced the Company’s commitment to own, operate and maintain a network of 43 fast chargers resulting in the recognition of $81,550 of deferred revenue during the quarter ended September 30, 2014. No revenue was recognized during the three months ended and the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The Company also received an additional $50,000 during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 to augment the units installed under the grant. For the three months ended nine months ended September 30, 2014, $8,835 and $12,232 had been recognized as revenue and the $50,000 was offset against the costs incurred to augment the units installed under the grant recorded in general and administrative expenses. On April 2, 2015, Nissan advised the Company that as a result of its material default of the Joint Marketing Agreement (“Agreement”), Nissan was terminating the Agreement and would take possession of the 31 uninstalled fast chargers currently held at a third party facility. Included in the Other Assets as of September 30, 2014 are 31 Nissan fast chargers valued at $512,089. Included in deferred revenue as of September 30, 2014 is $505,610 received from Nissan pertaining to these 31 fast chargers in conjunction with the Joint Marketing Agreement.

As of the acquisition date of Beam, Beam had a contract with the New York State Energy and Resource Development Authority (“NYSERDA”) for the installation of 28 electric vehicle charging stations in New York State. As of September 30, 2014, all 28 of these stations have been installed and the unamortized portion of the deferred revenue pertaining to these stations as of September 30, 2014 of $214,395 is being amortized over the charging stations’ remaining useful lives. $35,274 and $105,823 was recognized as revenue during the quarter ended and nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company owns the 28 charging stations.

Another subsidiary of the Company also had a contract with NYSERDA for the installation of 30 electric vehicle charging stations in New York State. As of September 30, 2014, all 30 of these stations have been installed and the unamortized portion of the deferred revenue pertaining to these stations as of September 30, 2014 of $104,254 is being amortized over the charging stations’ remaining useful lives. $12,441 and $38,962 was recognized as revenue during the quarter ended and nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company owns the 30 charging stations.

In conjunction with the Blink Asset Purchase Agreement (“Blink APA”) of the Blink Network assets pursuant to an auction approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court of the District of Arizona from ECOtality, the Company was assigned a grant with the California Energy Commission (“CEC”), subject to novation with the California Energy Commission (“CEC”), for the installation of electric charging stations in designated areas in California. ECOtality had completed some of the work, prior to its filing for bankruptcy, in accordance with the terms of the grant. Pursuant to the terms of the grant, all project billings to the CEC were subject to a 10% retainage to be released upon completion of all deliverables under the agreement. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was in negotiations, the outcome uncertain at the time, with the CEC to assume the remainder of the ECOtality agreement, under which satisfaction of all remaining deliverables would result in payment of all retainage. The Company assumed the grant in February 2014, however due to the uncertainty of CEC’s satisfaction of all remaining deliverables, the Company recorded the fair value of this amount at $0 at the time of the Blink APA. During the period of February 27, 2014 through May 15, 2014, the Company completed its contractual obligation to CEC by installing 22 electric vehicle charging stations. In June 2014, CEC paid the Company $763,698 representing $529,990 for amounts due as of December 31, 2013 and $233,708 for the recent 22 installations. The deferred revenue recognized during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $40,002 and $522,065, respectively and the deferred revenue balance at September 30, 2014 was $241,633 to be recognized over the remaining economic useful lives of the charging stations. The Company owns the electric charging stations installed under this grant.

The Company had a contract with the NV Energy Commission to receive $45,000 and to install nine electric vehicle charging stations in the state of Nevada. As of September 30, 2014, all nine stations had been installed and the unamortized portion of the deferred revenue pertaining to these stations as of September 30, 2014 was $36,376 which is being recognized over the charging stations remaining economic useful life. Deferred revenue of $3,750 and $8,624 was recognized as revenue during the quarter ended and nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company owns the nine charging stations.

Deferred revenue as of September 30, 2014 consisted of the following:

It is anticipated that deferred revenue as of September 30, 2014 will be recognized over the next four years as follows:

Grant, rebate and incentive revenue recognized during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $207,276, $48,303, $865,918 and $86,052, respectively.

Warrants issued in connection with several private placements contain provisions that protect holders from a decline in the issue price of the Company’s common stock (or “down-round”) or that contain net settlement provisions.  The Company accounts for these warrants as liabilities instead of equity.  Down-round provisions reduce the exercise price or conversion price of a warrant if a company either issues equity shares for a price that is lower than the exercise price of those instruments or issues new warrants or equity that have a lower exercise price or at a lower price.  Net settlement provisions allow the holder of the warrant to surrender shares underlying the warrant equal to the exercise price as payment of its exercise price, instead of physically exercising the warrant by paying cash.  The Company evaluates whether warrants to acquire its common stock contain provisions that protect holders from declines in the stock price or otherwise could result in modification of the exercise price and/or shares to be issued under the respective warrant agreements based on a variable that is not an input to the fair value of “fixed for fixed” option.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company offered all holders of warrants with round down protection the opportunity to waive those rights in exchange for warrants without round down protection and a premium of 27% in the number of shares underlying warrants for those holders who initially acquired their warrants in October 2013 and a 25% inducement in the number of warrants for those holders who initially acquired their warrants and warrant units in December 2013. The exchanged warrants have the same initial term, exercise price and vesting rights as the warrants which offered round down protection. The inducement warrants vest immediately, have a term of five years and an exercise price based on the date of the acceptance of the offer. As of September 30, 2014, 9,881,418 warrants and warrant units were exchanged for warrants which do not offer round down protection resulting in a reduction of the warrant liability of $4,494,608. The exchanged warrants which do not offer round down protection were valued at $1,596,685 as of September 30, 2014. Additionally, 2,626,068 inducement warrants issued were valued at $382,753 as of September 30, 2014. These warrants were subsequently surrendered to the Company in 2015 as more fully described in Note 19-Subsequent Events.  

The Company recognizes these warrants at their fair value and remeasures them at fair value on each reporting date.

The assumptions used in connection with the valuation of warrants and units were as follows:

Recurring Level 3 Activity and Reconciliation

The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).  The table reflects gains and losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for all financial liabilities categorized as Level 3.  There were no financial liabilities categorized as Level 3 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

COMPENSATION AND SERVICE WARRANTS AND OPTIONS

Option Issuances 

On November 30, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors and a majority of the Company’s shareholders approved the Company’s 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”). On January 11, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”). The 2013 Plan was approved by a majority of the Company’s shareholders on February 13, 2013 (collectively “The Plans”). The Plans enable the Company to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, phantom stock and dividend equivalent rights to employees, directors, consultants, and advisors of the Company and its affiliates, and to improve the ability of the Company to attract, retain, and motivate individuals upon whom the Company’s sustained growth and financial success depend, by providing such persons with an opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interest in the Company.  Stock options granted under the Plan may be Non-Qualified Stock Options or Incentive Stock Options, within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, except that stock options granted to outside directors and any consultants or advisers providing services to the Company or an affiliate shall in all cases be Non-Qualified Stock Options. The Plans are to be administered by the Board, which shall have discretion over the awards and grants thereunder. The option price must be at least 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant and if issued to a 10% or greater shareholder must be 110% of the fair market value on the date of the grant. The aggregate maximum number of shares of Common Stock for which stock options or awards may be granted pursuant to the Plans is 5,000,000 each, adjusted as provided in Section 11 of the Plan. No grants or awards may be issued under the Plans after December 1, 2014 and December 1, 2015, respectively.

On March 27, 2014, the Company entered into a contract with Mr. Andrew Shapiro to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors which was approved by the Board of Directors on April 17, 2014. The terms of the agreement require the Company to (1) issue options to Mr. Shapiro to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a premium of $0.01 to the closing market price on the date of the Board of Directors approval to his appointment to the Company’s Board of Directors which vest immediately and expire seven years from date of issuance; (2) a board fee of $100,000 payable in quarterly installments commencing 15 days from his appointment to the Company’s Board of Directors;(3) options to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s stock which vest in one year from the date of the meeting and expire five years from the date of issuance at an exercise price equal $0.01 in excess of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the meeting and a Nominal Fee, as defined, for every board meeting attended and (4) an Additional Fee, as defined, for every committee meeting of the Board of Directors attended. The Nominal Fee and the Additional Fee may be paid in cash or in shares of Company’s common stock based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the meeting. The fair value of the options was estimated at $313,296 with an exercise price of $1.01, using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the following assumptions: (1) a weighted average expected volatility of 131.2% based on historical volatility; (2) a weighted average interest rate of 1.03% (3) a weighted average expected life of 3.5 years and (4) a zero dividend yield. The stock price was determined based on the closing market price on the date of the grant. The fair value of the options is recorded in compensation expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

On July 11, 2014, the Company entered into a contract with Mr. Donald Engel to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors which was approved by the Board of Directors on July 30, 2014. The terms of the agreement require the Company to (1) issue options to Mr. Engel to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a $1.00 per share on the date of the Board of Directors approval to his appointment to the Company’s Board of Directors which vest immediately and expire five years from date of issuance; (2) options to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s stock which vest immediately and expire five years from the date of issuance at an exercise price equal $0.01in excess of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the meeting and a Nominal Fee, as defined, for every board meeting attended and (3) an Additional Fee, as defined, for every committee meeting of the Board of Directors attended. The Nominal Fee and the Additional Fee may be paid in cash or in shares of Company’s common stock based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the meeting. . The fair value of the options was estimated at $61,295 using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the following assumptions: (1) a weighted average expected volatility of 93.6% based on historical volatility; (2) a weighted average interest rate of 0.66% (3) a weighted average expected life of 2.5 years and (4) a zero dividend yield. The stock price was determined based on the closing market price on the date of the grant. The fair value of the options is recorded in compensation expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued options to purchase 165,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Board members for attendance of Board of Directors meetings. The fair value of the options was estimated at $160,714 using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the following assumptions: (1) a weighted average expected volatility range of 129.9% – 141.2% based on historical volatility; (2) a weighted average interest rate range of 0.97% - 1.77% (3) a weighted average expected life of 3.5 -5 years and (4) zero dividend yield. The stock price was determined based on the closing price on the respective dates of the grant and the exercise price ranged from $0.54 - $1.56. The option vesting range is from date of issuance to two years and all options expire five years from date of issuance. Additionally, the Company accrued a Nominal Fee, as defined, pertaining to Board member attendance of these meetings of $7,500 as September 30, 2014. The fair value of the options is recorded in compensation expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

On May 14, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of options to purchase 2,178,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to 36 employees and two consultants of the Company. The options vest on May 14, 2017 and expire on May 14, 2019. The fair value of the options was estimated at $1,570,910 using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the following assumptions: (1) a weighted average expected volatility of 130.7% based on historical volatility; (2) a weighted average interest rate of 1.00% (3) a weighted average expected life of 4 years and (4) a zero dividend yield. The stock price was determined based on the closing market price on the date of the grant and the exercise price is $1.00.

The following table accounts for the Company’s Plans option activity through September 30, 2014:

As of September 30, 2014, there are 7,649,665 options outstanding of which 2,921,665 options are exercisable. As of December 31, 2013, there were 4,943,665 options outstanding of which 2,154,665 were exercisable. The aggregate intrinsic value of the options outstanding as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 based on a closing price of $0.60 and $1.25, respectively, was $23,900 and $118,800, respectively. As of September 30, 2014, there was $3,165,095 of unrecognized expense that will be recognized over 2.31 years.

Warrant Issuances

On May 2, 2014, the Company obtained commitments through December 31, 2014 and through January 2, 2015 from four shareholders to finance up to $6,250,000. In conjunction with the commitment, the Company issued warrants to purchase a total of 3,869,048 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.05 per share which vest immediately and expire in five years. The fair value of the warrants was estimated at $726,868 and recorded as operating expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 using the multinomial lattice valuation model. The stock price was determined based on the closing market price on the date of the commitment letter. In addition, the Company would be required to issue additional warrants to the shareholders in the event, the Company exercises the commitment. The commitment amount may be reduced by the issuance of long term debt or the sale of common stock during the remainder of calendar year 2014. The Company paid placement agents $131,250 in commissions which is also recorded as operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. As of January 2, 2015, no funds were drawn on the commitments and the commitments expired and were not renewed.

On May 10, 2014, a firm executed an agreement to grant the Company exclusive rights to install charging stations on certain of the firm’s properties. In consideration, the Company would issue warrants to purchase a total of 2,607,712 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.97 per share based on the closing price on the execution date. As of September 24, 2014, the closing conditions in the agreement had been met, the agreement had been countersigned by the Company and the warrants been issued. The fair value of the warrants was estimated at $321,877 and recorded as operating expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 using the multinomial lattice valuation model.

In conjunction with the offer to exchange derivative liability warrants for non derivative liability warrants during the quarter ended September 30, 2014, 450,000 warrants were exchanged and 112,500 inducement warrants were issued as further described in Note 10. The fair value of the non derivative liability warrants was estimated at $56,261 and the inducement warrants were estimated at $14,065 respectively, both using the multinomial lattice model. The premium warrant fair value is recorded as Other Expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, 9,881,418 warrants were exchanged and 2,626,069 inducement warrants were issued. The fair value of the non derivative liability warrants was estimated at $1,434,112 and the inducement warrants were estimated at $382,753 respectively, both using the multinomial lattice model.

On August 8, 2014, the Company issued 714,209 warrants to the former Beam members, payable as of June 30, 2014, at a fair value estimated at $247,800 as more fully described in Note 11-Warrant Payable.

The assumptions used in connection with the valuation of warrants using the multinomial lattice model were as follows:

The following table accounts for the Company’s warrant activity for the period of January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014:

The number of warrants exercisable as of September 30, 2014 was 43,394,205 and 37,873,337 were exercisable as of December 31, 2013.

Warrants and Options Issued for Compensation and Services

The following table summarizes options and warrants for compensation, warrants and fees:

The Company recognized compensation cost related to the options and warrants for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 of $910,837, $4,602,653, $3,325,968 and $7,910,076, respectively.

The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 40,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred shares are designated as 20,000,000 shares to Series A Preferred Convertible stock; 10,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred stock; 250,000 shares to Series C Preferred Convertible stock and 19,740,000 shares undesignated.

PREFERRED STOCK

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

In connection with the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, on December 7, 2009 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.001 and convertible into 2.5 common shares for every Series A Convertible Preferred so long as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is outstanding. The Series A Convertible Preferred will have five times the vote of a common share when the Series C Convertible Preferred is no longer outstanding. The stock has no redemption rights.

Liquidation Preference

The Series A preferred stock shall have no liquidation preference so long as the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock shall be outstanding.

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

In an anticipation of a settlement of an adversary proceeding initiated by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors regarding the Plan of Reorganization in regards to Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation, et al, the Company designated 10,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 and a stated value of $100 per share and convertible into common shares based on the average of the price of the preceding prior 30 trading days as of the date of the request to convert. The Series B Convertible Preferred has no voting rights except under limited conditions as defined and redemption rights as defined.

Liquidation Preference

The holders of Series B and the Series C convertible preferred holders proportionately, shall be entitled to receive out of the assets, whether capital or surplus, of the Corporation an amount in cash equal to the Stated Value for each respective share of Series B or Series C Convertible Preferred Stock before any payments or distributions are made to holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock or holders of common stock.

Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

A total of 250,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock have been designated for issuance under the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Certificate of Designation”). The shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock have a stated value of $100 per share with an initial conversion price of $0.70 per common share (subject to adjustment as provided in the Series C Certificate of Designation). The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock may, at the option of the purchaser, be converted at any time or from time to time into fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock at the conversion price in effect at the time of conversion; provided, that a holder of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock may at any given time convert only up to that number of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock so that, upon conversion, the aggregate beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock as calculated, (pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act) of such purchaser and all persons affiliated with such purchaser, is not more than 9.99% of the Company’s Common Stock then outstanding. The number of shares into which one share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock shall be convertible is determined by dividing the stated value of $100 per share by the initial Conversion Price of $0.70 per common share (subject to appropriate adjustment for certain events, as defined). Shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock shall receive dividends at a quarterly rate payable in either cash or additional shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. If the dividend is paid in cash the quarterly dividend payment shall be equal to 2% of the Stated Value per share for each of the then outstanding shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. If, however, the quarterly dividend is paid in shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock the quarterly dividend payment shall be equal to 2.5% of the Stated Value per share for each of the then outstanding shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. In the event of a liquidation, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is also entitled to a liquidation preference equal to the Stated Value plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. Except as otherwise required by law, the holders of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock shall vote on an as-if-converted-to-Common-Stock basis with the Common Stock. However, as long as any shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are outstanding, the Company shall not take certain actions, as defined,, without the prior written consent of at least sixty percent (60%) of the then outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock At any time following the second anniversary following the issuance of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, at the option of the holder, each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock shall be redeemable for an amount equal to the Stated Value plus all accrued but unpaid dividends plus 1% per month, compounded monthly from the closing date. As a result thereof, all other investors in the Company’s December 2013 financing had the exercise price of their warrants reduced to $0.70.

Liquidation Preference

The Series C preferred stock holders shall be entitled to receive out of the assets, whether capital or surplus, of the Corporation an amount in cash equal to the Stated Value, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon at the Cash Dividend Rate and any other fees or liquidated damages then due and owing thereon under this Certificate of Designation, for each share of Preferred Stock before any distribution or payment shall be made to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, any Junior Securities, and if the assets of the Corporation shall be insufficient to pay in full such amounts, then the entire assets to be distributed to the holders shall be ratably distributed among the holders in accordance with the respective amounts that would be payable on such shares if all amounts payable thereon were paid in full. After payment of the Stated Value, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, to each holder, the remaining balance of any proceeds from the Liquidation shall be allocated to the holders, holders of Series A Preferred Stock and holders of any Common Stock on an as-if-converted-to-Common-Stock basis.

COMMON STOCK

On January 15, 2014, in accordance with terms of the cashless exercise provisions of the warrants, a shareholder exchanged 355,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.00 per share and 604,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.50 for 468,702 fully vested shares of common stock of the Company.  The transaction was recorded as an increase to common stock and a decrease to Additional Paid-In Capital of $469 based on the cashless exercise provisions of the warrants.

The Company settled a pending lawsuit for past due fees due to a consulting firm in the amount of $41,000.  On January 31, 2014, the parties negotiated a settlement resulting in the issuance of 4,098 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $1.22 per share, the market value on the date of the settlement and a cash payment of $15,000.  The transaction resulted in a gain on settlement of approximately $21,000 recorded in Other Income/(Expense).

The Company issued 100,000 fully vested shares valued at $137,000 to a firm on February 14, 2014 which sponsored a conference in December 2013. The value was determined based on the market value of the stock on the date of the conference and recorded as an accrued expense and general and administrative expense at December 31, 2013.

Compensation expense related to the issuance of common stock for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0, $1,070,866, $0 and $1,837,881, respectively.

The Company paid commissions to a company owned by its Chief Executive Officer totaling $18,000, $7,000, $40,250 and $16,000 during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 for business development related to installations of EV charging stations by the Company in accordance with the support services contract. These amounts are recorded as compensation on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The Company incurred accounting and tax service fees totaling $21,528, $20,202, $23,317 and $30,115 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 provided by a company that is partially owned by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.  This expense was recorded as general and administrative expense.

On March 29, 2012, the Company entered into a patent license agreement with its CEO and a company for which the CEO is the majority shareholder and an officer of the company. Under terms of the agreement, the Company has agreed to pay royalties to the licensors equal to 10% of the gross profits received by the Company from bona fide commercial sales and/or use of the licensed products and licensed processes. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has not paid nor incurred any royalty fees related to this agreement.

The Company has entered into several contracts that obligate it to future office space lease payments and consulting contracts for financial and investor relations services. The following is a summary of these commitments:

The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Miami Beach, Florida. The Company currently leases space located at 1691 Michigan Avenue, Suite 601, Miami Beach Florida 33139. The lease is for a term of 39 months beginning on March 1, 2012 and ending May 31, 2015. Monthly lease payments are approximately $12,000 for a total of approximately $468,000 for the total term of the lease. The negotiations between the landlord and the Company are in abeyance. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has a certificate of deposit in the amount of $210,671 at a financial institution which serves as security deposit to the landlord and is therefore restricted. The certificate of deposit had matured in October 2014. The lease was extended through August 1, 2015 at a base monthly rental of $13,928. The Company is currently in negotiations with a new landlord for new rental space for its Miami Beach headquarters. Additionally, the Company has a three-year lease for an office in San Jose, California beginning on April 1, 2012 and ending April 30, 2015 with monthly lease payments of approximately $2,500 for a total of approximately $92,000 for the total term of the lease. The lease was extended to April 30, 2016 at a monthly rental of $3,009. The Company also has a five year sublease for office and warehouse space in Phoenix, Arizona beginning December 1, 2013 and ending November 30, 2018 with monthly payments of approximately $10,300 for a total of approximately $621,000 for the total term, and one year office sharing license for office space in New York, New York beginning January 16, 2014 and ending January 31, 2015 with monthly payments of approximately $4,000 for a total of approximately $48,000 for the total term of the license. The Company currently leases the space for a $1,000 monthly on a month-to-month basis.

Our minimum future aggregate minimum lease payments for these leases based on their initial terms as of September 30, 2014 are:

Total rent expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $88,103, 16,729, $311,691 and $38,213, respectively.

Pursuant to the terms of the amendment of the March 30, 2012 master agreement with a key supplier, the Company has committed to purchase 500 charging stations over the year ended December 31, 2012, at prices ranging from $2,500 to $2,700 per unit. If the Company fails to take delivery of the total specified number units, it will be responsible for reimbursement of certain price discounts on units previously received totaling approximately $42,000. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has purchased 90 units under this master agreement. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the vendor has not performed in accordance with the terms of the master agreement. As of June 16, 2015, the ultimate resolution of this matter is unknown.

On November 27, 2013, the Synapse Sustainability Trust (“Synapse”) filed a complaint against the Company and Michael D. Farkas, the Company’s CEO, alleging various causes of action regarding compliance under certain agreements that governed the sale of Synapse’s assets to CCGI in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Onondaga (the “Court”). On or about January 7, 2014, CCGI filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses. CCGI moved to dismiss Count V, breach of contract, because the Note, as detailed in Note 11- Notes Payable, contains an arbitration clause. Further, Mr. Farkas has moved to dismiss the Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.  On March 17, 2014, the Court dismissed Mr. Farkas from the action due to a lack of personal jurisdiction and dismissed Plaintiff’s Count V based on the existence of the Arbitration Clause contained in the Note. In the Court's letter decision issued on March 17, 2014, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint/Count V against Michael Farkas, and dismissed Count VI against CCGI.  Accordingly, the Court granted Plaintiff's Contempt Motion in part, and denied it in part, and scheduled a hearing on the contempt issue for May 13, 2014.  The hearing was canceled. On March 5, 2015, the parties reached a settlement requiring the Company to pay $10,000 on March 15, 2015 and $5,000 per month for the next eight months with no interest. Until such time as the debt by the Company, Synapse will retain a security interest of $40,000 in specified chargers. As of June 16, 2015, the Company had paid $30,000.  

On or about December 6, 2013, the Company filed a Complaint against Tim Mason and Mariana Gerzanych in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging claims for Breach of Contract, Fraud in the Inducement, Civil Conspiracy to Commit Fraud, Unjust Enrichment, and Breach of Fiduciary Duty.  These claims were in relation to the Company’s purchase of 350 Green and the documents entered into (and allegedly breached by Gerzanych and Mason) related thereto.  The Defendants in this case were recently served with the court documents, and the Company intends to litigate this case vigorously. Each defendant filed for bankruptcy in January 2014 and as a result a stay was granted preventing the case from moving forward. In April 2014, the defendants filed a complaint in the Bankruptcy Court alleging declaratory relief, breach of contract in the exchange agreement and the promissory note, claim and delivery, fraud in the inducement, unjust enrichment and objection to claim. CCGI moved to change venue to New York and moved to dismiss in California. Gerzanych and Mason have filed a motion to consolidate the New York action and the adversary complaint and tried before the Bankruptcy Court. On or about December 30, 2014 the Bankruptcy Court issued an order transferring all adversary preceedings and the California Complaint to the Southern District of New York. Pursuant to the Court’s order, the Company amended its complaint tin the New York action to add an additional count for declaratory relief. Defendants have moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint based on the release agreement between the parties.  The Company believes that the release was procured by fraud and is therefore invalid and is in the process of drafting response papers.  In the interim, the parties are currently attempting to negotiate a settlement.

On June 3, 2014, Manhattan Charging, Joseph Turquie (the Company's former Chief Marketing Officer), Jamie Turquie and Brian Valenza, former Beam members, filed a complaint against the Company alleging various causes of action regarding compliance under certain agreements that governed the sale of Beam Charging, LLC to the Company. On April 24, 2015, the parties reached a settlement whereby the Company issued an aggregate of 100,000 fully vested common shares to the defendants, paid Mr. Turquie $25,000 and agreed to pay Mr. Turquie $50,000, payable at $5,000 per month, commencing on May 1, 2015 without interest of which $10,000 had been paid as of June 16, 2015. Messrs. Turquie and Valenza relinquished their anti-dilution benefit, as defined, see Note 11-Warrant Payable.

On September 17, 2014, the Company filed a lawsuit against three former consultants of the Company for failure to provide services to the Company in accordance with the terms of the consulting agreement. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, the consultants were to be compensated by the issuance of 550,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. On August 20, 2014, the consultants contacted the Company’s stock transfer agent seeking to have the restricted legend removed from the stock certificates, however the Company did not authorize such removal due to the consultants failure to provide services in accordance with the consulting agreement. The Company was seeking the return of any certificates currently in the possession of the consultants or the proceeds from any sales of such shares to the extent the consultants had sold shares. The Company sought an injunction to stop the defendants from selling shares but was denied by the Court on November 19, 2014. On October 28, 2014, the defendants filed a counterclaim against the Company alleging various claims of wrongdoing. On April 28, 2015, the parties reached a settlement whereby the defendants will be able to retain $150,000 in gross proceeds from the sale of shares, as defined, from the 412,501 common shares of the Company’s common stock, currently in their possession and shall return any unsold shares to the Company or any gross proceeds from the sale of shares in excess of $150,000. No shares have been returned to the Company as of June 12, 2015. Additionally the defendants agreed to forgo the 137,499 unissued shares of Company common stock which were the subject of the counterclaim of the defendants. The Company also agreed to pay $12,500 of the defendant’s legal costs which has been paid in full as of June 16, 2015.

On January 20, 2015, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (“Committee”) filed a motion to set aside Confirmation Order Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9024 (“Order”) requesting that the Bankruptcy court set aside a prior order confirming a Plan of Reorganization (“Plan”), previously confirmed by the Court on December 31, 2014, to which a wholly owned subsidiary (“subsidiary”) of the Company was a party, due to the alleged failure by the subsidiary and the Company to perform certain obligations as required by the Order and alleged misrepresentations, non-disclosures and other alleged actions in relation thereto. On February 2, 2015, the Committee then initiated an adversary proceeding in the Bankruptcy Case and filed a complaint against the Company requesting the same relief and reserving all rights and remedies regarding civil causes of action or damages against the defendants. The matter has been resolved between the parties in accordance with amended terms as described in Note 19- Subsequent Events.

350 Green, LLC

There have been five lawsuits filed by creditors of 350 Green regarding unpaid claims. These lawsuits relate solely to alleged pre-acquisition unpaid debts of 350 Green.  Also, there are other unpaid creditors, aside from those noted above, that claim to be owed certain amounts for pre-acquisition work done on behalf of 350 Green solely, that potentially could file lawsuits at some point in the future.  

On August 7, 2014, 350 Green received a copy of a complaint filed by Sheetz, a former vendor of 350 Green alleging breach of contract an unjust enrichment. The complaint names 350 Green, 350 Holdings LLC and CCGI in separate breach of contract counts and names all three entities together in an unjust enrichment claim. CCGI and 350 Holdings will seek to be dismissed from the litigation, because, as the complaint is currently plead, there is no legal basis to hold CCGI or 350 Green liable for a contract to which they are not parties. The parties held a mediation conference on May 15, 2015 and the parties are in the process of negotiating a settlement.

From time to time, the Company is a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. As such the Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of the provision required for these commitments and contingencies, if any, which would be charged to earnings, is made after careful analysis of each matter. The provision may change in the future due to new developments or changes in circumstances. Changes in the provision could increase or decrease the Company’s earnings in the period the changes are made. It is the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Series C Convertible Preferred Securities Sale

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain investors (the “Purchasers”) for an aggregate of $6,000,000 (the “Aggregate Subscription Amount”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued the following to the Purchasers: (i) 60,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock convertible into 8,571,429 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, (the “Common Stock”); and (ii) warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of 8,571,429 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrant Shares”) for an exercise price of $1.00 per share and discussed further in Note1-ORGANIZATION-LIQUIDITY.

As of June 16, 2015, the Company received the initial $2,000,000 and the investors have released an additional $3,000,000 in consideration of the formation of an Operations and Finance Committee (“OPFIN Committee”) to provide the Company with financial and operational direction, management and oversight with respect to the Company’s operating plan and fiscal year 2015 revised budget and to oversee progress. The Committee is comprised of Messrs. Farkas and Shapiro, current members of the Company’s Board of Directors, an outside financial consultant, a representative of the Purchasers and Mr. Ira Feintuch, the Company’s newly appointed Chief Operating Officer. The OPFIN Committee has formed an Executive Committee consisting of Mr. Farkas, the outside financial consultant and Mr. Feintuch to carry out the day to day financial and operational management of the Company.

In connection with the sale of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the Purchasers, pursuant to which the Company agreed to register all of the shares of Common Stock underlying the Series C Preferred Stock and Warrant Shares (the “Registrable Securities”) on a Form S-1 registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to use best efforts to cause the Registration Statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act within 180 days following the Closing Date (or, in the event of a “full review” by the SEC, within 210 calendar days following the Closing Date) (the “Effectiveness Deadline”). If the Company does not meet the Effectiveness Deadline, the Company will have to pay the Purchaser a penalty equal to 1% of the Aggregate Subscription Amount with a maximum of 10% of the Aggregate Subscription Amount and pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The Company may choose to pay all liquidated damages in Preferred Shares at 125% of the liquidated damages amount.

On December 23, 2014, in connection with the closing and as a condition to the closing of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Michael Farkas. The amendment provides that Mr. Farkas shall have a salary of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000) per month. However, for such time as any of the Aggregate Subscription Amount is still held in escrow, Mr. Farkas shall receive Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) in cash and the remaining amount of his compensation: (i) shall be deferred; and (ii) must be determined by the compensation committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to be fair and equitable. Additionally, beginning on the date that the Aggregate Subscription Amount is released from escrow and continuing for so long as the Series C Preferred Stock remains issued and outstanding, Mr. Farkas’ salary shall only be paid in cash if doing so would not put the Company in a negative operating cash flow position.

Other Equity and Debt Issuances

During the period of October 6, 2014 through December 1, 2014, the Company issued four notes to the Company’s CEO totaling $135,000, due on the six month anniversary date of the respective note with interest at 8% per annum. As of June 11, 2015, the Company had repaid $35,300, inclusive of interest.

During the period of October 1, 2014 through June 12, 2015, the Company issued warrants to purchase 293,863 shares of the Company’s common stock to the former members of Beam at exercise prices ranging from $0.33 to$1.05 per share inclusive of warrants payable to purchase 31,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as of September 30, 2014 as described in Note 11-Warrant Payable.

During the period of October 16, 2014 through June 12, 2015 the Company issued 23,810 fully vested shares of common stock under its 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan at to two principals of a consulting firm to provide strategic financial services.

During the period of October 1, 2014 through June 1, 2015, the Company issued 150,034 fully vested common shares of the Company’s common stock at the closing market price on the date of the respective meeting and options to purchase 90,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.33 to $0.53 per share to members of the Board of Directors for attendance of Board meetings held during this time.

During the period of March 23, 2015 through June 11, 2015, the Company issued a member of the Board of Directors, as a participant of and attendance of meetings it newly formed OPFIN Committee an option to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at prices ranging from $0.34 - $0.38 per share. The options vest in two years and expire five years from date of issuance.

On November 13, 2014, the Company issued a $200,000 note to an investor which is convertible into 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share and 400,000 warrants at an exercise price of $1.05 per common share. The note was due on January 14, 2015 with interest at 12% per annum. Through June 12, 2015, the Company has repaid $109,008, inclusive of accrued interest. On February 20, 2015, the Company renegotiated the terms of the remaining unpaid $100,000 balance such that the due date extended to March 31, 2015. The investor received a five year warrant, which vests immediately, to purchase an additional 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share. On May 1, 2015, the Company renegotiated the terms of the unpaid balance with the investor such that the unpaid balance accrued interest at the rate of 2% per month as of April 1, 2015 and the balance was due as of June 1, 2015. In consideration thereof, the Company, on April 1, 2015 issued the investor an a warrant to purchase an additional 50,000 common shares at $1.00 which expires on April 1, 2020. Additionally, the Company extended the expiration dates of warrants issued in October 2012 to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the investor and its affiliates from October 2015 to October 2017. The $100,000 balance and accrued interest thereon remains unpaid as of June 16, 2015.

On December 15, 2014, the Company issued a note to a company for which the Company’s CEO is the majority shareholder and an officer of the company, in the amount of $65,000, due on the six month anniversary date of the note with interest at 8% per annum. The Note was paid in full with accrued interest thereon of $202 on December 29, 2014.

On December 28, 2014, the Company issued, to the Company’s CEO, a warrant to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.40 per share. The warrants vest immediately and expire two years from date of issuance. The warrant was issued as a replacement of a warrant which had expired in accordance with the CEO’s employment contract.

On February 3, 2015, the Company issued 50,000 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock to a consultant to advise the Company about corporate governance matters.

On February 25, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with the investors of the October 11, 2013 financing whereby the investors were issued warrants to purchase 3,336,734 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.70 per share which vest immediately, expire in five years from date of issuance and contain anti-dilution provisions as defined. These additional warrants represent the additional warrants the investors would have received as a result of the December 23, 2014 financing had they not surrendered their anti-dilution protection during the quarter ended June 30, 2014. In conjunction therewith, the October 2013 investors surrendered 2,102,142 previously issued warrants as consideration for removal of derivative liability attributes from warrants issued in conjunction with the Company’s October 2013 financing. Additionally, the exercise price of all 19,761,714 warrants issued to the October 2013 and December 2013 investors was reduced to $0.70 per common share and contain anti-dilution protection, as defined.

On April 10, 2015 the Company issued 51,586 fully vested common shares to its Chief Financial Officer as compensation for the period of November 2014 through April 2015.

On April 17, 2015, the Company issued 432,892 fully vested shares of its common stock to a consulting firm for services rendered by a financial consultant for the period of December 2014 through March 2015.

Acquisition

On December 31, 2014, the United States Bankruptcy Court, District Arizona (“Bankruptcy Court”) issued a Confirmation Order Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9024 in the Bankruptcy case, in regards to: Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation (Case No. 13-626), confirming a Plan of Reorganization of Electric Transport Engineering Corporation, whereby the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the estate (“Creditors”) would own 50% of the Reorganized Electric Transport Engineering Corporation (“Reorganized ETEC”) in consideration, as amended, of foregoing the amounts formerly owed by the estate and the Company would own the remaining 50% of the Reorganized ETEC in consideration of an amended payment of $375,000 in cash and a subsequent $825,000 cash payment to the Creditors secured by 8,250 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The Company’s amended cash payment consisted of reimbursement of $281,000 of Creditors’ professional fees, and the foregoing of the $94,000 in receivables owed the Company and included in accounts receivable on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet on September 30, 2014.

Other Matters

On March 24, 2015, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Ira Feintuch to serve as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer for an initial three year term renewable annually unless written notice is provided 60 day prior to the renewal term. In consideration thereof, Mr. Feintuch is to receive an annual salary of $250,000 and shall participate in all benefit programs of the Company. In addition, Mr. Feintuch will receive 1,000,000 Series A Convertible Preferred shares, 1,500 Series C Convertible Preferred shares and 1,500,000 shares of common stock. These stock awards are payable 50% upon the signing of the employment agreement and 50% upon the one year anniversary of the employment agreement.

As part of the litigation settlement, on April 24, 2015, with two former members of Beam were issued an aggregate of 100,000 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $0.35 per share.

On May 21, 2015, the Company offered the remaining seven former Beam members shares of the Company’s common shares in consideration of surrendering their anti-dilution benefit contained in the original Beam acquisition agreement. As of June 12, 2015, two members had accepted the Company’s offer, however the shares have yet to be issued.

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue” negatives thereof or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Report and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations; business strategies; future cash flows; financing plans; plans and objectives of management; any other statements regarding future operations, future cash needs, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.

From time to time, forward-looking statements also are included in our other periodic reports on Form 10-K, Forms 10-Q and 8-K, in our press releases, in our presentations, on our website and in other materials released to the public.  Any or all of the forward-looking statements included in this Report and in any other reports or public statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and may turn out to be inaccurate. These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors.  Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Report and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Report.

Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

For discussion of other factors that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results see “Item 1A — Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K received by the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2014.

Overview

Car Charging Group, Inc. (“CarCharging”) is a pioneer in nationwide public electric vehicle (EV) charging services, enabling EV drivers to easily recharge at locations throughout the United States. Headquartered in Miami Beach, FL with offices in San Jose, CA, New York, NY, and Phoenix, AZ. CarCharging’s business model is designed to accelerate the adoption of public EV charging.

CarCharging offers various options to commercial and residential property owners for EV charging services. Our typical business model provides a comprehensive turnkey program where CarCharging owns and operates the EV charging equipment; manages the installation, maintenance, and related services; and shares a portion of the EV charging revenue with the property owner. Alternatively, property partners can share in the equipment and installation expenses with CarCharging operating and managing the EV charging stations and providing network connectivity. For properties interested in purchasing and owning EV charging stations, CarCharging can also provide EV charging hardware, site recommendations, connection to the Blink Network, and management and maintenance services.

CarCharging has strategic partnerships across multiple business sectors including multi-family residential and commercial properties, parking garages, shopping malls, retail parking, and municipalities.  CarCharging’s partners include, but are not limited to Walgreens, IKEA, Wal-Mart, Simon Property Group, Equity One, Equity Residential, Forest City, Fox Studios, Facebook, Kimpton Hotels and Restaurants, Mayo Clinic, San Diego Padres, University of Pennsylvania, Ace Parking, Central/USA Parking, Icon Parking, Rapid Parking, Parking Concepts, CVS, Related Management, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, City of Phoenix (AZ), City of Philadelphia (PA), and City of Miami Beach (FL).

Through its subsidiary, Blink Network, CarCharging also provides residential EV charging solutions for single-family homes.  For more information, please visit www.BlinkHQ.com.