f10q0312_carcharging.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

_______________

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______.

Commission File Number: 33-1155965

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		03-0608147
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S Employee Identification No.)

1691 Michigan Avenue, Sixth Floor

Miami Beach, FL 33139

(Address of principal executive offices)

_______________

(305) 521-0200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

_______________

n/a

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes o No x

As of May 15, 2012, 40,288,450 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, were issued and outstanding.

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

FORM 10-Q

March 31, 2012

INDEX

PART I-- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5
Item 4.	Control and Procedures	5

PART II-- OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	6
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	6
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	6
Item 5.	Other Information	6
Item 6.	Exhibits	6

SIGNATURES

PART I- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

March 31, 2012

Index to Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	Page #

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011	F-1

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the Period from September 3, 2009 (Inception) through March 31, 2012 (Unaudited)	F-2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Period September 3, 2009 (Inception) through March 31, 2012 (Unaudited)	F-3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the Period from September 3, 2009 (Inception) through March 31, 2012 (Unaudited)	F-4

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	F-5

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

	MARCH 31,			DECEMBER 31,
	2012			2011
ASSETS	(UNAUDITED)
CURRENT ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents	$	670,667		$	406,859
Advanced commissions		210,250			172,250
Deposits		13,314			6,444
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		328,333			157,258
Total current assets		1,222,564			742,811

FIXED ASSETS:
Automobiles, net of accumulated depreciation of $0 and $0, respectively		107,050			-
EV Charging stations, net of accumulated depreciation of
$158,022 and $129,554, respectively		657,637			544,898
Office and computer equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $17,430 and $14,810, respectively		41,528			35,857
Total fixed assets		806,215			580,755

OTHER ASSETS		12,062			-

TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,040,841		$	1,323,566

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	318,074		$	365,113
Accrued interest-related party		-			40
Convertible notes-related party, net of discount of		-			3,750
$0 and $0, respectivley
Current portion of note payable		11,410			-
Preferred stock payable		1,000,000			-
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		1,329,484			368,903

OTHER LIABILITIES:
Note payable		45,640			-

TOTAL LIABILITIES		1,375,124			368,903

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Series A Convertible Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share;
20,000,000 authorized; 10,000,000 and 10,000,000 issued and outstanding
at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		10,000			10,000
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 500,000,000 shares
authorized; 39,788,450 and 37,384,414 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		39,788			37,384
Additional paid-in capital		16,798,552			15,557,096
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(15,183,623	)		(13,650,817	)
Stock subscriptions receivable		(999,000	)		(999,000	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		665,717			954,663

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	2,040,841		$	1,323,566

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

							For the
							Period from September 3, 2009
	For the Three Months Ended						(Inception) to
	MARCH 31,			MARCH 31,			MARCH 31,
	2012			2011			2012

Revenue:
Service Fees	$	2,605		$	-		$	5,404
Sales		-			-			59,490
TOTAL REVENUE		2,605						64,894

Costs:
Cost of Services-Service		408			-			1,625
Cost of Services-Sales		-			-			60,830
TOTAL COSTS		408			-			62,455

GROSS PROFIT		2,197			-			2,439

Operating expenses:
Compensation		528,779			647,520			10,558,221
Other Operating expenses		124,808			101,398			856,131
General and administrative		881,383			201,928			3,440,789
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		1,534,970			950,846			14,855,141

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(1,532,773	)		(950,846	)		(14,852,702	)

Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(33	)		(12,061	)		(91,138	)
Loss on exchange of warrants to stock		-			-			(485,000	)
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative liability		-			3,333,490			245,217
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(33	)		3,321,429			(330,921	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,532,806	)		2,370,583			(15,183,623	)

Income tax provision		-			-			-

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(1,532,806	)	$	2,370,583		$	(15,183,623	)

Income (loss) per common share - basic & diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	0.47

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic & diluted		38,245,679			4,972,576

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

													Deficit Accumulated						Total
	Preferred - A		Preferred-A		Common		Common			Additional Paid-in			during the Development			Stock Subscriptions			Stockholders Equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount			Capital			Stage			Receivable			(Deficit)

Balance at September 3, 2009 (Inception)		-	$	-		1,000,000	$	50,000		$	(50,000	)	$	-		$	-		$	-

Reverse acquisition adjustment		10,000,000		10,000		395,150		19,758			(70,515	)								(40,757	)

Sale of common (net of derivative liability of warrants $586,535)						61,333		3,067			295,398									298,465

Effect of 1:50 reverse split								(71,369	)		71,369									-

Net loss														(6,801,183	)

Balance at December 31, 2009		10,000,000	$	10,000		1,456,483	$	1,456		$	246,252		$	(6,801,183	)	$	-		$	(6,543,475	)

Common stock issued for debt to founders						92,000		4,600												4,600

Common stock issued for services						21,167		1,058			432,441									433,499

Common stock issued for conversion of convertible notes (net of derivative liability for conversion feature of $552,872)						120,000		6,000			561,872									567,872

Sale of common stock with warrants attached (net of derivative liability on 3,833 warrants of $75,839)						3,834		191			(18,531	)								(18,340	)

Common stock issued for cash						103,333		5,167			1,385,380									1,390,547

Warrants issued for services											6,995,084									6,995,084

Effect of 1:50 reverse split								(16,675	)		16,675									-

Net loss 2010														(5,709,559	)					(5,709,559	)

Balance at December 31, 2010		10,000,000	$	10,000		1,796,817	$	1,797		$	9,619,173		$	(12,510,742	)	$	-		$	(2,879,772	)

Common stock issued for conversion of convertible notes and accrued interest						32,708,544		32,709			52,982									85,691

Common stock issued in exchange for extinguishment of warrants						565,000		565			484,435									485,000

Common stock issued for settlement of accounts payable						17,482		17			24,983									25,000

Common stock issued in connection with debt issuance						5,000		5			5,995									6,000

Common stock issued for services						458,238		458			701,042									701,500

Sales of common stock						1,833,333		1,833			3,497,166						(999,000	)		2,499,999

Warrants issued for services											1,171,320									1,171,320

Net loss 2011														(1,140,075	)					(1,140,075	)

Balance at December 31, 2011		10,000,000	$	10,000		37,384,414	$	37,384		$	15,557,096		$	(13,650,817	)	$	(999,000	)	$	954,663

Sale of common stock						550,000		550			549,450									550,000

Common stock issued for conversion of convertible notes and accrued interest						1,529,036		1,529			2,294									3,823

Common stock issued for services						250,000		250			449,750									450,000

Common stock issued for director compensation						75,000		75			146,175									146,250

Warrants issued for compensation											93,787									93,787

Net loss														(1,532,806	)					(1,532,806	)

Balance at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)		10,000,000	$	10,000		39,788,450	$	39,788		$	16,798,552		$	(15,183,623	)	$	(999,000	)	$	665,717

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

							For the
							Period from September 3, 2009
	For the Three Months Ended						(Inception) to
	March 31,			March 31,			March 31,
	2012			2011			2012

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income (loss)	$	(1,532,806	)	$	2,370,583		$	(15,183,623	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		31,088			17,957			181,074
Amortization of discount on convertible notes payable		-			9,638			70,166
Loss on common stock issued in exchange for extinguishment of warrants		-			-			485,000
Gain on change in fair value of derivative liability		-			(3,333,490	)		(245,217	)
Non-cash compensation		240,037			-			240,037
Common stock and warrants issued for services and incentive fees		450,000			586,084			9,780,833
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Inventory		-			-			(72,768	)
Advanced commissions		(38,000	)		(14,500	)		(186,000	)
Deposits		(6,908	)		47,728			(29,294	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(170,963	)		(33,257	)		(330,570	)
Other assets		(12,063	)		-			(12,063	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		2,961			(5,426	)		393,037
Accrued interest-related party		(40	)		2,602			4,480
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(1,036,694	)		(352,081	)		(4,904,908	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of office and computer equipment		(8,291	)		-			(58,958	)
Purchase of automobile		(50,000	)		-			(50,000	)
Purchase of electric charging stations		(141,207	)		(107,289	)		(748,512	)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(199,498	)		(107,289	)		(857,470	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from notes payable to stockholder		-			125,000			100,000
Proceeds from preferred stock payable		1,000,000			-			1,000,000
Sale of common stock, net of issuing cost		500,000			-			5,333,045
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		1,500,000			125,000			6,433,045

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		263,808			(334,370	)		670,667

CASH AT THE BEGINNING OF PERIOD		406,859			373,868			-
CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	670,667		$	39,498		$	670,667

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASHFLOW ACTIVITIES-
Cash Paid For:
Interest expenses	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-

NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCINGACTIVITIES-
Common stock issued for debt and accrued interest	$	3,823		$	58,441		$	577,695
Inventory reclassified to Property and Equipment	$	-		$	72,768		$	72,768
Debt and accrued interest converted to common stock	$	-		$	15,000		$	100,691
Common stock issued in exchange for extinguishment of warrants	$	-		$	-		$	485,000
Common stock issued for settlement of accounts payable	$	-		$	-		$	25,000
Common stock issued for director compensation	$	146,250		$	-		$	146,250
Common stock issued for services	$	450,000		$	433,499		$	1,584,999
Warrants issued for services	$	93,787		$	6,995,084		$	8,260,191
Note payable for purchase of automobile	$	57,050		$	-		$	57,050

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.

March 31, 2012

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1. ORGANIZATION

Car Charging Group Inc. (“CCGI”) was incorporated on October 3, 2006 under the laws of the State of Nevada as New Image Concepts, Inc. On November 20, 2009, New Image Concepts, Inc. changed its name to Car Charging Group, Inc.

Car Charging, Inc., was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on September 3, 2009. Car Charging Inc. was created to develop electric charging service facilities for the electric vehicle (EV) automobile market. Pursuant to its business plan, Car Charging Inc. (or its affiliates) acquires and installs EV charging stations, and shares servicing fees received from customers that use the charging stations with the property owner(s), on a property by property basis. Car Charging, Inc., therefore, enters into individual arrangements for this purpose with various property owners, which may include, cities, counties, garage operators, hospitals, shopping-malls and facility owner/operators.

During February 2011, the Shareholders and Board of Directors authorized a decrease of our issued and outstanding common stock, in the form of a reverse stock-split, on a one-for-fifty (1:50) basis (the “Reverse Stock-Split”). There was no change to the authorized amount of shares or to the par value. All share and per share amounts included in the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the effects of the Reverse Stock-Split.

Merger

On December 7, 2009, CCGI entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Car Charging, Inc. (“CCI”)

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, CCGI agreed to issue an aggregate of 10,000,000 restricted shares of CCGI's common stock and 10,000,000 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to the CCI Shareholders in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of CCI.

The merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization. CCI is the acquirer for accounting purposes and CCGI is the issuer. Accordingly, CCGI’s historical financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition became those of the acquirer retroactively restated for the equivalent number of shares issued in the merger. Operations prior to the merger are those of CCI. From inception on September 3, 2009 until the merger date, December 7, 2009, CCI had minimal operations with no revenues. Earnings per share for the period prior to the merger are restated to reflect the equivalent number of shares outstanding.

The consolidated financial statements consist of CCGI and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to herein as the “Company” or “Car Charging.” All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012.

F-5

DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

The Company is a development stage company as defined by ASC 915-10 “Development Stage Entities.” The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and developing revenue generating opportunities through its planned principal operations. In the latter half of 2011, the Company’s principal sales operations began however the Company did not recognize significant revenues during the period. All losses accumulated since inceptions have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

LIQUIDITY

Historically, the Company has been dependent on debt and equity raised from individual investors to sustain its operations. The Company’s product has not been placed in enough locations to generate significant revenue. The Company has incurred losses and used cash for operating activities since inception. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $15,183,624. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had common stock subscription receivable of $1,000,000, $500,000 of which was received on April 3, 2012 with the remainder due in June, 2012. On February 6, 2012, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to sell 1,000,000 shares of a new class of preferred stock at per share price of $1.00. Although there can be no assurance, management believes that the Company has sufficient resources to fund the Company’s operations through at least March 31, 2013.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents in both the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company has cash on deposits in several financial institutions which, at times, may be in excess of FDIC insurance limits. Management has deemed this a normal business risk.

EV CHARGING STATIONS

EV Charging Stations represents the depreciable cost of charging devices that have been installed on the premises of participating owner/operator properties. They are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of three years. Upon sale, replacement or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company held approximately $256,000 and $185,000 in EV charging stations that were not placed in service as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company will begin depreciating this equipment when installation is substantially complete. Depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and for the period from September 3, 2009 (inception) through March 31, 2012 was $28,468, and $16,285, and $163,644, respectively.

OFFICE AND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT

Office and computer equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of five years. Upon sale or retirement of furniture and fixtures, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in Consolidated Statements of Operations. Depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and for the period from September 3, 2009 (inception) through March 31, 2012 was $2,620, and $1,673 and $17,430, respectively.

Automobile

Automobiles are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of five years. Upon sale or retirement of automobiles, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in Consolidated Statements of Operations. Since the Company’s automobile was not in service as of March 31, 2012, no related depreciation has been recorded.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include EV Charging Stations, office and computer equipment and security deposit, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company determined that there were no impairments of long-lived assets as of March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

F-6

DISCOUNT ON DEBT

The Company allocated the proceeds received from convertible debt instruments between the underlying debt instruments and has recorded the conversion feature as a liability in accordance with paragraph 815-15-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The conversion feature and certain other features that are considered embedded derivative instruments, such as a conversion reset provision have been recorded at their fair value within the terms of paragraph 815-15-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as its fair value can be separated from the convertible note and its conversion is independent of the underlying note value. The conversion liability is marked to market each reporting period with the resulting gains or losses shown on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The Company evaluates its convertible debt, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 810-10-05-4 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and paragraph 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Level 2 inputs are inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s notes payable approximate the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement which are Level 2 inputs.

The Company revalues its derivative liability at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the consolidated statement of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative liability. The Company has no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Accordingly, when a customer completes use of a charging station , the service can be deemed rendered and revenue may be recognized.

F-7

RECLASSIFICATION

Certain prior period financial statement line items have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION FOR OBTAINING EMPLOYEE SERVICES

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to employees and directors pursuant to paragraphs 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, whereby all transactions in which services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more readily measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with service conditions and when applicable a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

EQUITY INSTRUMENTS ISSUED TO PARTIES OTHER THAN EMPLOYEES FOR ACQUIRING GOODS OR SERVICES

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC Section 505-50-30”). Pursuant to FASB ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

ADVERTISING

The Company expenses non-direct advertising as incurred. Total advertising expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and for the period from September 3, 2009 (inception) through March 31, 2012 was $0, $0, and $27,411, respectively.

INCOME TAXES

The Company follows Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

F-8

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period.

The following table shows the weighted-average number of potentially outstanding dilutive shares excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, as they were anti-dilutive (after giving effect to the Reverse Stock-Split):

	2012	2011

Convertible notes	-	12,400,000

Preferred stock	25,000,000	25,000,000

Warrants	11,933,169	1,654,378
Total Potential Dilutive Shares	36,933,169	39,054,378

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

CASH FLOWS REPORTING

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

F-9

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under study by standard-setting organizations and various regulatory agencies. Because of the tentative and preliminary nature of these proposed standards, management has not determined whether implementation of such proposed standards would be material to our unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3. NOTES PAYABLE

CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

Convertible notes payable bear interest of 6% annually which were payable upon maturity on September 25, 2011. The notes have a conversion price of $.0025.

During June, 2010, $5,000 of these notes was converted to 40,000 common shares.

During July, 2010, $10,000 of these notes was converted to 80,000 common shares.

During January, 2011, $4,000 of these notes was converted to 32,000 common shares.

During March, 2011, $50,000 of these notes together with $4,441 of accrued interest were converted to 21,776,544 common shares.

During May and June of 2011, $4,000 of these notes were converted to 1,600,000 common shares.

During July, 2011, $12,500 of these notes were converted to 5,000,000 common shares.

During September, 2011, $10,750 of these notes were converted to 4,300,000 common shares.

On February 29, 2012, the final $3,750 of convertible notes and accrued interest were converted into 1,529,036 common shares.

Subsequent to this transaction, there are no outstanding convertible notes.

F-10

Note Payable

In connection with the automobile purchased by the Company in the first quarter, the Company entered into a financing agreement. The five-year note bears interest at 4.75% and is secured by the related asset. Future minimum principal payments of $11,410 are due annually as of March 31, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.

Derivative analysis

Upon their origination, these notes had full reset adjustments based upon the issuance of equity securities by the Company in the future, they were subjected to derivative liability treatment under Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standard Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) (formerly FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 07-5). These notes have been measured at fair value using a lattice model at each reporting period with gains and losses from the change in fair value of derivative liabilities recognized on the consolidated statement of operations. The convertible notes gave rise to a derivative liability which was recorded as a discount to the notes upon origination.

The embedded derivative of these notes was re-measured at December 31, 2010 yielding a gain on change in fair value of the derivative of $3,097,216, net of conversions to common stock, for the year ended December 31, 2010 and a loss of $5,799,110 for the period from September 3, 2009 through December 31, 2009. The derivative value of these notes at December 31, 2010, yielded a derivative liability at fair value of $2,701,894. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company converted $15,000 in convertible notes payable to 120,000 shares of common stock. The conversion resulted in a reduction of the derivative liability and increase to paid-in capital of approximately $553,000.

In March, 2011, the Company issued 21,776,544 common shares pursuant to the conversion of $50,000 in notes payable together with $4,441 of accrued interest. This conversion was negotiated to mitigate the effect of the 1:50 Reverse-Split on the note conversion price which Management determined could have significantly dilutive effects due to its resets and toxic convertible features.

In March, 2011, agreements between the Company and the remaining note holders to fix the conversion rate stated in the convertible notes effectively removed the embedded derivative from the convertible notes. Accordingly, as future conversions were no longer subject to reset, the derivative liability related to the notes was adjusted to $0 and the Company recognized a gain on the change in value of the derivative liability of $2,701,894 upon execution.

4. COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS

Subscription warrants

In connection with the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, on December 7, 2009 the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement for the sale of 61,333 units of securities of the Company aggregating $920,000. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of Company’s common stock exercisable at $.60 per share. The exercise price was subject to a full ratchet reset feature. 16,667 of these warrants were cancelled in 2010. The remaining warrants were adjusted due to a sale of common stock for cash at $3.00 per share, resulting in 446,665 warrants outstanding. The fair value of these warrants granted, were estimated on the date of grant, and recorded as a derivative liability. The derivative was re-measured at December 31, 2010 using their reset value yielding a gain on the change in fair value of $225,579 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and a loss in fair value of $1,182,375 during the period from September 3, 2009 through December 31, 2009, the outstanding liability for the related derivative liability was $636,220 at December 31, 2010. As further disclosed in Note 5, in October 2011, the warrant holders agreed to the cancellation of their outstanding warrants in exchange for 565,000 shares of common stock. This agreement effectively eliminated the remaining derivative liability associated with these warrants of approximately $80,000.

As of May 5, 2010, 3,834 additional units aggregating $57,500 were issued under a private placement. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of Company’s common stock exercisable at $30.00 per share. The related warrants issued in this place did not contain a full ratchet reset.

In connection with the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, on December 7, 2009 the Company also issued warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of Company’s common stock exercisable at $.60 per share. The exercise price was subject to a full ratchet reset feature. These warrants were adjusted due to a sale of common stock for cash at $3.00 per share, resulting in 100,000 warrants. The derivative for these 100,000 warrants was re-measured at December 31, 2010 yielding a derivative liability of $129,749, resulting in a gain on change in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $15,589 and a loss in fair value of $1,182,375 during the period from September 3, 2009 through December 31, 2009. The outstanding liability for the related derivative liability was $129,749 at December 31, 2010. In October 2011, the Company executed an agreement with the warrant holder which eliminated the reset feature of these warrants. As a result of this agreement, the derivative liability associated with the reset is no longer present and the gain on the remaining fair value of approximately $17,500 was recognized.

F-11

Compensation warrants

On April 1, 2010, the Company issued 55,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, 5,000 at an exercise price of $15.00 and 50,000 warrants exercisable at $30.00 per share.

On April 12, 2010, the Company issued 5,000 warrants to purchase shares exercisable at $42.50 per share. The fair value of these warrants, estimated on the date of grant, was recorded as a expense for consulting services of $32,355.

On April 27, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 440,000 shares of Company’s common stock exercisable at $15 per share. The exercise price of these 440,000 shares was subject to a full ratchet reset feature. These warrants were adjusted in June 2011 due to a sale of common stock for cash at $3.00 per share, resulting in 2,200,000 warrants. The fair value of all of these warrants, estimated on the date of grant, was recorded as compensation expense of $3,099,009.

On August 25, 2010, the Company issued 1,033,433 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $15 per share. The exercise price of these warrants was subject to a full ratchet reset feature. These warrants were adjusted in June 2011 due to a sale of common stock for cash at $3.00 per share, resulting in 5,167,565 warrants. The Company also issued 10,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $51.50 per share. The fair value of all of the warrants, estimated on the date of grant, was recorded as compensation expense of $3,896,075.

On February 17, 2011, the Company issued 50,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $20 per share. The fair value of all of the warrants, estimated on the date of grant, was recorded as compensation expense of $ 483,583.

On July 18, 2011, the Company issued 1,277,170 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $1.66 per share. The fair value of all of the warrants, estimated on the date of grant, was recorded as other operating incentive expense of $528,111.

On August 10, 2011, the Company issued 200,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $2.50 per share; 500,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $5.00 per share; 500,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $7.50 per share; and 500,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $10.00. The fair value of all of these warrants, estimated on the date of grant, was recorded as consulting compensation expense of $81,633.

On September 23, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $3.00 per share. The exercise price was subject to a full ratchet reset feature. As a result, the fair value of these warrants, estimated on the date of grant, was recorded as a derivative liability and related discount of short-term notes of $20,751. On October 24, 2011, the warrants were amended to remove the ratchet feature and the exercise price was reduced to a $1.00 per share. The note was paid in full in November 2011 and the remaining discount recorded as interest expense.

On November 15, 2011, the Company issued 250,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $1.50 per share. The fair value of all of the warrants, estimated on the date of grant, was recorded as consulting compensation expense of $77,993.

In October 2011, the Company executed agreements with certain employees and consultants which eliminated the reset feature of 7,467,165 warrants. As of December 31, 2011 all outstanding warrants have fixed exercise prices.

On January 16, 2012, the Company, in connection with the hire of a Chief Operating Officer, issued 1,000,000 warrants, at an exercise price of $1.75 per warrant that vest over a three year period, subject to continued employment.

On March 27, 2012, the Company, in connection with the hire of a Sales Manager, issued 15,000 warrants, at an exercise price of $1.75 per warrant that vest over a three year period, subject to continued employment.

F-12

The fair value of all warrant issuances was computed using either the Lattice Model or Black Scholes Model, both of which incorporate transaction details such as stock price, contractual terms, maturity and risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financing, volatility and holder behavior.

The fair value of the warrants on the date of the grant issued for the three months ended March 31, 2012, was estimated at approximately $1.7 million and $260,000, respectively, which will be recognized over the service period. The fair value of the options on the grant date was estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model and the following assumptions: (1) expected volatility of nearly 390% based on historical volatility (2) a discount rate of 2.11%, (3) expected life of 3 years and (4) zero dividend yield. The fair value of the warrants was determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company recognized compensation cost related to the vesting of these warrants of approximately $94,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes outstanding warrants by Expiration Date at March 31, 2012:

Quantity		Exercise Price		Expiration Date

	100,000		3.00	December 7, 2012
	50,000		30.00	April 1, 2013
	5,000		15.00	April 1, 2013
	5,000		42.50	April 12, 2012
	2,200,000		3.00	April 27,2013
	3,834		30.00	May 5, 2015
	515,000		3.00	August 25, 2012
	4,652,165		3.00	August 25, 2013
	10,000		51.50	August 25, 2013
	50,000		20.00	January 11, 2016
	200,000		2.50	August 10, 2012
	500,000		5.00	August 10, 2013
	500,000		7.50	August 10, 2013
	500,000		10.00	August 10, 2013
	1,277,170		1.66	July 18, 2014
	100,000		1.00	September 22, 2018
	300,000		1.75	January 16, 2016
	300,000		1.75	January 16, 2017
	400,000		1.75	January 16,2018
	5,000		1.75	March 19, 2016
	5,000		1.75	March 19, 2017
	5,000		1.75	March 19, 2018
	250,000		1.50	November 15, 2014
	11,933,169

				Warrants Outstanding
Range of Exercise Price		Number Outstanding 3/31/12		Weighted Average Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price

	$1.00-$51.50		11,933,169		3.61		2.09

				Warrants Outstanding
Range of Exercise Price		Number Outstanding 3/31/12		Weighted Average Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price

	$1.00-$51.50		9,418,168		3.04		3.07

F-13

5. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

In connection with the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, on December 7, 2009 the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.001.

The Series A has five (5) times the number of votes on all matters to which common share holders are entitled, bears no dividends, has a liquidation value eight times that sum available for distribution to common stock holders and is convertible at the option of the holder after the date of issuance at a rate of 2.5 shares of common stock for every preferred share issued however, the preferred shares cannot be converted if conversion would cause the holder to own more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock (or after 61 days up to 9.99%).

Preferred Stock Payable

On February 6, 2012, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to sell 1,000,000 shares of a new class of preferred stock at per share price of $1.00. The preferred stock, which is expected to be designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, has yet to be authorized. The agreement includes an option to purchase an additional 1,500,000 shares of the Series B Preferred stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share within 60 days of the issuance of the original 1,000,000 shares. Additionally, if the Purchaser exercises their options in the initial stock purchase agreement, they will receive additional payment for their consulting services for developing business relationships and obtaining charging station locations in Greece in the form of 3% of the total outstanding common stock of Car Charging Europe, a subsidiary that is in the process of being formed. The Company received the $1,000,000 in February 2012 and has elected to record this transaction as a current liability as the preferred stock has not yet been authorized or issued as of March 31, 2012.

Common stock

On December 7, 2009 the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement for the sale of 61,333 units of securities of the Company aggregating $920,000. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of Company’s common stock exercisable at $30.00 per share. The Company received $885,000, which was net of costs of $35,000.

On February 19, 2010, the Company issued 92,000 shares of its common stock at $.05 per share, to extinguish a debt to its founders of $4,600 included in accounts payable. The stock was treated as founders’ shares and issued at its par value of $0.001.

On February 19, 2010, the Company issued 8,500 shares of its common stock at $15 per share, for services performed with a fair value of $127,500.

On May 5, 2010, the Company issued 3,834 shares of common stock at $15.00 per share with warrants attached exercisable at $30.00 per share. See the description of warrants with embedded derivatives in Note 5 above for a more complete description of this transaction.

During June 2010, the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock at $.125 each, in exchange for $5,000 of convertible notes payable. During July 2010 the Company issued 80,000 shares of common stock at $.125 each, in exchange for $10,000 of convertible notes payable. During January 2011, the Company issued 32,000 shares of common stock at $.125 each, in exchange for $4,000 of convertible notes payable. During March, 2011, the Company issued 21,776,544 common shares in exchange for $50,000 of convertible notes payable and related interest of $4,441. See the derivative analysis of this transaction in Note 4 above for a description of this transaction.

On July 30, 2010, the Company issued 36,667 shares of common stock at $15.00 per share.

On August 19, 2010, the Company issued 6,000 shares of its common stock at $ 51.50 per share, for services performed with a fair value of $ 309,000.

On September 7, 2010, the Company issued 66,667 shares of common stock at $15.00 per share, together with 6,667 shares of common stock for services performed in connection with the sale of these share. The Company received $886,005, which was net of costs of $113,995.

On January 3, 2011, the Company issued 250 shares of common stock in payment of $17,000 in services that had been received during 2010. In addition, the Company entered into a continuing services agreement that provides for issuance of $1,500 of common stock per month (see commitments note). The Company issued 3,706 shares of common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2011, in accordance with the agreement.

F-14

On February 4, 2011, the Company issued 3,000 shares of common stock in payment of $81,000 in services.

During June, 2011, the Company issued 1,005 shares of common stock in payment of $3,000 in services and issued 333,333 shares for cash at $3.00 per share.

During July, 2011, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock at $1.80 per share for services performed.

During August, 2011, the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock at $1.25 per share for services performed.

During September, 2011, the Company issued 17,482 shares of common stock in exchange for forgiveness of a $25,000 account payable.

During October, 2011, the Company issued 3,527 shares of stock in exchange for $6,000 worth of services.

In October 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with three warrant holders, whereby the Company issued 565,000 shares of common stock in exchange for warrants to purchase 446,665 shares. The exchange agreement terminates all rights associated with the warrants. Due to the reset feature of these warrants, they represented a derivative liability of approximately $80,000 at the time of the exchange. The Company elected to treat this transaction in accordance with ASC 470-50-40 “Extinguishment of Debt”. Per the codification, the Company recognized a loss for the excess of consideration in the form of common stock given over the fair value of the extinguished instrument. On the measurement date, the fair value of the common stock issued was $1.00 per share and the warrants had a combined fair market value of $80,000. The exchange resulted in the Company recording a loss on the conversion of $485,000, which was recorded as a Loss on Exchange in the Other Income (Expense) section of the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In November, 2011, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement for 2.5 million shares of common stock in exchange for $2.5 million in cash. In accordance with this agreement, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share. The agreement calls for the issuance of 500,000 additional shares to be issued in March of 2012, funding of which was received on April 3, 2012 and 500,000 shares to be issued in June of 2012, each at $1.00 per share. The stock subscription, net of common share amount to be issued, resulted in stock subscription receivable of $999,000 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

During December, 2011, the Company issued 5,000 shares in connection with the receipt of a loan resulting in a discount on the loan of approximately $21,000. The loan was paid in full prior to year end and the discount was recognized as interest.

During 2011, the Company issued 32,708,544 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of $81,250 in convertible notes payable, as further described in Footnote 4. On February 29, 2012, the final $3,750 of convertible notes and related interest were converted into 1,529,036 of common stock.

Subsequent to this transaction, there are no outstanding convertible notes.

On January 6, 2012, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock, at $1.00 per share, in related to a stock purchase agreement executed in 2011.

On February 27, 2012, the Company, in connection with the hire of an interim Chief Financial Officer and Director, issued 75,000 shares of restricted common stock at $1.95 per share.

On February 27, 2012, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement for 500,000 shares of restricted common stock in exchange for $500,000 cash.

On February 29, 2012, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock in connection with a consulting agreement at $1.80 per share.

F-15

6. RELATED PARTY

The Company paid consulting fees to a company that is owned by its Chief Executive Officer amounting to $0, $30,000, and $306,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and for the period from September 3, 2009 (inception) through March 31, 2012, respectively. These fees were paid pursuant to the terms of a two-year support services contract that was in place prior to the CEO’s employment.

On March 29, 2012, the Company entered into a patent license agreement with a stockholder of the Company and a related party under common ownership. Under terms of the agreement, the Company has agreed to pay royalties to the licensors equal to 10% of the gross profits received by the Company from bona fide commercial sales and/or use of the licensed products and licensed processes. As of March 31, 2012, the Company has not paid any royalty fees related to this agreement.

7. COMMITMENTS

The company has entered into several contracts that obligate it to future office space lease payments and consulting contracts for financial and investor relations services. The following is a summary of these commitments:

At March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a three (3) year lease for office space at approximately $132,480 per year, with an option to renew for an additional three years at approximately $137,655 per year. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the office owner space declared bankruptcy and the Company has not been required to pay any rent payments. However, the Company has continued to accrue monthly rent based on the contracted amount through December 31, 2011. In addition, the Company has written off the related $34,000 security deposit, as it is not expected to be recovered. The Company now treats the lease as a month-to-month lease. Total rent expense was $2,468, $20,408 and $224,167 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and for the period from September 3, 2009 (inception) through March 31, 2012, respectively.

b)	During 2011, pursuant to the terms of a master agreement, the Company has committed to purchase 250 charging stations over the year, 25 units per month, for an amount in excess of $3,100 per unit. If the Company fails to take delivery of the total specified number units, it will be responsible for reimbursement of certain price discounts on units previously received.

c)	The Company has certain lawsuits pending. The first is for past due fees due to a consulting firm in the amount of $41,000. Although the outcome of this matter is uncertain, the Company has reserved for this amount in accounts payable and accrued expenses at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Additionally, In March and April 2012, a former officer and director of the Company filed declaratory actions against the Company relating to compensatory matters, certain warrant exercise rights and the termination of his employment. No determination can be made as to the outcome of this matter at this time. Management believes these suits to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself.

8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date these financial statements were issued.

In April, 2012, the Company was awarded a $1,000,000 grant from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection to help develop electric vehicle infrastructure on the Pennsylvania Turnpike. The grant is subject to the finalization of certain documentation. Under the terms of the grant, the Company will be subject to certain limitations in the spending of the grant funds and will have certain funding obligations.

F-16

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue” negatives thereof or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Report and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations; business strategies; future cash flows; financing plans; plans and objectives of management; any other statements regarding future operations, future cash needs, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.

From time to time, forward-looking statements also are included in our other periodic reports on Form 10-K, Forms 10-Q and 8-K, in our press releases, in our presentations, on our website and in other materials released to the public. Any or all of the forward-looking statements included in this Report and in any other reports or public statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and may turn out to be inaccurate. These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Report and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Report.

Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

For discussion of factors that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results see “Item 1A — Risk Factors” below.

Overview

Car Charging Group, Inc. (the “Company”) provides an electric charging service for the electric vehicle (EV) automobile market, delivering convenient access for EV drivers to refuel their automobiles wherever they live, work and play. The Company seeks to become a leading provider of EV charging services throughout North America and ultimately in Europe and Asia. In order for electric vehicles to become a mainstream reality, public EV charging stations need to be in place and readily available to consumers nationally.

Car Charging installs electric charging services where EV owners are likely to live, commute, and shop, leading to a higher utilization on every installation investment. We contract with property owners and managers who control locations in high traffic areas where there is accelerating consumer adoption of electric cars as a less expensive means of transportation coupled with a focus on greenhouse gas savings.

Charging installs fast charging stations, enabling most EV owners to fully recharge their batteries from empty in about four hours. However, most drivers will use our service to “top off” their batteries, to re-energize their batteries from approximately half a charge to a full charge. Car Charging sets its price based on a variety of factors, some of which are local electricity tariffs, location, and competitive services. The stations that provide our service are sourced from a third party today, many of which are purchased from Coulomb Technologies.

Our approach is to become a strategic partner with property owners, who own high value real estate, and to demonstrate the value we offer their locations. Consumers seek businesses that support energy conservation and the Car Charging service provides a differentiator for those real estate owners who want to promote themselves as supporters of the “green” movement. Electric vehicle charging provides this missing component for many property owners. Furthermore, our business model provides for the potential for increased revenue per parking spot. Car Charging offers the property owner a share in the revenue stream generated from the charging sessions as well as any other revenue derived from the location.

Over the past year and half, Car Charging has contracts with and generated strong relationships with many of the essential property owners required to build a profitable charging business. Real estate segments we have established strong ties with include apartment complexes/MDUs for residential living, REITs, national parking garage owners and managers, retailers, shopping centers and malls, high population density municipalities, and office parks. Partnerships under contract in the parking market segment include ICON, Central, ACE, and LAZ parking. In the residential arena, contracts include Forest City, Equity One, Equity Residential, and Kettler. In the retail segment, relationships include Walgreens, Mall of America, Aventura Mall, and Four Seasons in Miami. Lastly, municipalities own and operate prime locations where we have relationships and those include the Pennsylvania Turnpike, Norwalk, and Dania Beach.

Our main source of revenue will be derived from the electric charging services, with pricing set as an hourly rate or on a per kilowatt hour rate. As more states adopt electricity deregulation, Car Charging will be in a more advantageous position to be competitively price its service vis-a-vis refueling at home. As a first mover in the Electric Vehicle infrastructure category, Car Charging is set to capitalize on the opportunities presented by this emerging industry.

Our Company is able to facilitate the purchase of EV charging stations through its wholly owned subsidiary, eCharging Stations, LLC. The installation and maintenance of the EV charging equipment is subcontracted through approved local vendors. It is competitively bid so as to maintain the lowest installation and on-going costs possible.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company has installed charging units at twelve additional locations, bringing the total number of locations that we currently service to 64.

History

The Company was incorporated in October 2006 in Nevada with the intention of providing personal consultation services to the general public. On December 7, 2009, we entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with Car Charging, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Car Charging”).

At closing, pursuant to the majority consent of our board of directors and shareholders, we approved (i) an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation changing our name to Car Charging Group, Inc. and (ii) the authorization of 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock of the Company. Additionally, we filed a Certificate of Designation with the state of Nevada designating rights to the authorized preferred stock of the Company (the “Series A Convertible Preferred Stock”).

During February, 2011, the Shareholders and Board of Directors authorized a decrease of our issued and outstanding common stock, in the form of a reverse stock-split, on a one-for-fifty (1:50) basis (the “Reverse Stock-Split”). All share and per share amounts included in the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the effects of the Reverse Stock-Split.

Corporate Structure

Car Charging Group, Inc. is the parent company of Car Charging, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which serves as the main operating company and is, in turn, the parent company of several distinct wholly-owned subsidiary operating companies.

Results of Operations

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

The Company generated revenues of $2,605 in revenues from service fees related to installed EV Charging Stations for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The Company did not derive any revenue from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011. While the Company’s primary strategy is to earn revenue through the installation and maintenance of EV Charging Stations, the Company will sell EV Charging Stations on occasions when the opportunity presents itself.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses include equipment and installation expenses, marketing and advertising expenses, operations, sales, marketing, finance and legal functions. As the number of property contracts increase, the equipment and installation expenses rise accordingly. Car Charging obtains competitive bids for each installation location in order to decrease these costs. Operating expenses have increased $584,124, or 61%, to $1,534,970 from $950,846 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This increase is due to payments to outside consultants in cash and stock equivalents of $600,000 and additional operating costs. This increase is offset by a decrease in compensation from the prior period due to higher warrant compensation expense in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2012.

Sales expenses are incurred once a contract is signed and the service is initiated. Marketing expenses include essential industry conference participation and regional exhibits to engage with prospective property owners as well as consultants who develop our website, public relations outreach as well as social media engagement.

Net Income (Loss)

Our net operating loss during the three months ended March 31, 2012 is attributable to the fact that we are beginning to derive revenue from operations to offset our business development expenses. Losses from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 amounted to $1,532,773, which primarily consists of compensation expense of $528,779 (including non-cash compensation to directors and employees of nearly $240,000), General an administrative expenses of $881,383 (including consulting fees of $600,00 - $450,000 of this consulting expense represents the non-cash estimated cost of warrants that were issued for services during the period) and payments for investor relations of nearly $121,000.

Our net operating loss during the three months ended March 31, 2011 is attributable to the fact that we have not derived any revenue from operations to offset our business development expenses. Losses from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $950,846, which primarily consists of compensation expense of $647,520 (including consulting fees of $523,813 - $483,583 of this consulting expense represents the non-cash estimated cost of warrants that were issued for services during the period), Promotion expense of $ 93,500, and Public / Investor Relations expense of approximately $24,000. Our net operating loss was offset by the change in the Company’s liability related to embedded derivative transactions resulted in a gain on change in fair value of $3,333,490. This resulted in a net income of $2,370,583 for the three month period ended March 31, 2011.

Period from September 3, 2009 (date of inception) through March 31, 2012

Our cumulative net operating loss since inception is attributable to the fact that we have not derived significant revenue from operations to offset our business development expenses. Losses from operations since inception have amounted to $15,183,623 (including non-cash charges of $10,020,870 which is the estimated value of warrants and common stock issued for services) primarily consisting of consulting, professional fees and public/investor relations fees. The Company’s officers and staff have initiated a number of negotiations to install the selected charging stations through-out the United States and Europe. Manufacture and supply of electric vehicles that will require utilization of the Company’s services is not anticipated to be significant until the last calendar quarter of 2012; this gives the Company adequate time to develop its distribution plan, but also requires that the Company continue to develop capital sources.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On February 27, 2012, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement for 500,000 shares of restricted common stock in exchange for $500,000 cash.

The Company has financed its activities from sales of capital stock of the Company and from loans from unrelated and related parties. A significant portion of the funds raised from the sale of capital stock has been used to cover working capital needs such as office expenses and various consulting and professional fees.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we used cash of $1,036,694 and $352,081 for operations, respectively and $4,904,908 since inception. Such cash use and accumulated losses have resulted primarily from costs related to various consulting and professional fee and costs incurred in connection with capital transactions. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, cash used for investing activities consisted of $199,498 for purchases of electric charging stations, automobile and office equipment as compared with $107,289 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Cash provided by financing activities was $1,500,000 from a $500,000 common stock subscription and a $1.0 million preferred stock subscription during the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to $125,000 provided by financing activity, from a short-term note payable for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The net increase in cash during the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $263,808 as compared with a net decrease of $334,370 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Since its inception, the Company has used cash for investing activities of $857,470 for the purchase of fixed assets and the Company has received cash provided by financing activities of $100,000 from notes payable and $6,333,045 from sales of preferred and common stock..

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures. An evaluation was conducted by the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s controls and procedures were ineffective as of March 31, 2012 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the registrant files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and includes controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. If the Company develops new business or engages or hires a new chief financial officer or similar financial expert, the Company intends to review its disclosure controls and procedures.

Management is aware of the lack of an independent audit committee or audit committee financial expert. Although our board of directors serves as the audit committee it has no independent directors. Further, we have not identified an audit committee financial expert on our board of directors. These factors are counter to corporate governance practices as defined by the various stock exchanges and may lead to less supervision over management.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There were no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In March and April 2012, a former officer and director of the Company filed declaratory actions in the 11th Circuit Court for Miami-Dad County, Florida against the Company relating to compensatory matters, certain warrant exercise rights and the termination of his employment. No determination can be made as to the outcome of this matter at this time. Management believes these suits to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself.

The Company has a lawsuit pending in the 11th Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida for past due fees due to a consulting firm in the amount of $41,000. Although the outcome of this matter is uncertain, the Company has reserved for this amount in accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risk Factors are included on the Company’s 10-K filed on April 16, 2012, and do not need to be updated.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There were no unregistered sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds during the period ended March 31, 2012.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the period ended March 31, 2012.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

There is no other information required to be disclosed under this item which was not previously disclosed.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS *	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH *	XBRL Taxonomy Schema

101.CAL *	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF *	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase

101.LAB *	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase

101.PRE *	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase

In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.

* Furnished herewith. XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.

	By: /s/ Michael D. Farkas
Date: May 15, 2012	Michael D. Farkas Chief Executive Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)

	By: /s/ Jack Zwick
	Jack Zwick Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)