UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission File No. 333-149784
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 03-0608147 | |
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
3284 West 29 Court | ||
Hollywood, Florida | 33020-1320 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (305) 521-0200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | [ ] | Accelerated filer | [ ] |
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | [ ] | Smaller reporting company | [X] |
Emerging growth company | [ ] |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of May 9, 2017, the registrant had 81,534,822 common shares issued and outstanding.
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 2,988 | $ | 5,898 | ||||
Accounts receivable and other receivables, net | 170,186 | 128,315 | ||||||
Inventory, net | 310,639 | 394,825 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 94,893 | 84,631 | ||||||
Total Current Assets | 578,706 | 613,669 | ||||||
Fixed assets, net | 637,211 | 755,682 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 113,903 | 116,482 | ||||||
Deferred public offering costs | 617,437 | 335,475 | ||||||
Other assets | 59,133 | 89,573 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 2,006,390 | $ | 1,910,881 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency | ||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 3,864,105 | $ | 3,500,267 | ||||
Accounts payable [1] | 3,728,193 | 3,728,193 | ||||||
Current portion of accrued expenses | 6,987,808 |
7,955,976 | ||||||
Accrued expenses [1] | 5,969 | 5,969 | ||||||
Current portion of accrued public information fee | - | 3,005,277 | ||||||
Derivative liabilities | 2,338,790 | 1,583,103 | ||||||
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $671,977 and $501,981 as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 1,253,674 | 581,274 | ||||||
Convertible notes payable - related party | 542,567 | 495,000 | ||||||
Notes payable | 342,781 | 342,781 | ||||||
Current portion of deferred revenue | 504,077 | 600,700 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 19,567,964 |
21,798,540 | ||||||
Accrued expenses, net of current portion | 3,150,212 |
- | ||||||
Accrued public information fee, net of current portion | 3,005,277 | - | ||||||
Deferred revenue, net of current portion | 86,762 | 99,495 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 25,810,215 | 21,898,035 | ||||||
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, 10,000 shares designated, 8,250 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 2016 | 825,000 | 825,000 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders’ Deficiency: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 20,000,000 shares designated, 11,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | 11,000 | 11,000 | ||||||
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, 250,000 shares designated, 150,426 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | 150 | 150 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 80,476,508 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | 80,477 | 80,477 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 63,280,376 | 63,999,315 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (84,169,514 | ) | (81,071,782 | ) | ||||
Total Car Charging Group Inc. - Stockholders’ Deficiency | (20,797,511 | ) | (16,980,840 | ) | ||||
Non-controlling interest [1] | (3,831,314 | ) | (3,831,314 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholder’s Deficiency | (24,628,825 | ) | (20,812,154 | ) | ||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency | $ | 2,006,390 | $ | 1,910,881 |
[1] - Related to 350 Green, which became a variable interest entity of the Company on April 17, 2014.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
For The Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
Charging service revenue - company-owned charging stations | $ | 267,874 | $ | 292,743 | ||||
Product sales | 153,587 | 290,205 | ||||||
Grant and rebate revenue | 32,810 | 99,780 | ||||||
Warranty revenue | 34,849 | 20,025 | ||||||
Network fees | 49,238 | 43,119 | ||||||
Other | 57,262 | 94,265 | ||||||
Total Revenues | 595,620 | 840,137 | ||||||
Cost of Revenues: | ||||||||
Cost of charging services - company-owned charging stations | 26,563 | 51,978 | ||||||
Host provider fees | 54,447 | 111,790 | ||||||
Cost of product sales | 78,512 | 153,786 | ||||||
Network costs | 141,584 | 156,001 | ||||||
Warranty and repairs and maintenance | 19,148 | 71,116 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 112,153 | 202,104 | ||||||
Total Cost of Revenues | 432,407 | 746,775 | ||||||
Gross Profit | 163,213 | 93,362 | ||||||
Operating Expenses: | ||||||||
Compensation | 997,357 | 1,463,779 | ||||||
Other operating expenses | 242,941 | 344,803 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 313,708 | 268,904 | ||||||
Lease termination costs | 300,000 | - | ||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 1,854,006 | 2,077,486 | ||||||
Loss From Operations | (1,690,793 | ) | (1,984,124 | ) | ||||
Other (Expense) Income: | ||||||||
Interest expense | (140,661 | ) | (35,238 | ) | ||||
Amortization of discount on convertible debt | (614,901 | ) | - | |||||
Gain on settlement of accounts payable | 23,928 | - | ||||||
Loss on settlement reserve | (175,000 | ) | - | |||||
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities | (464,289 | ) | (2,014,408 | ) | ||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | - | (2,831 | ) | |||||
Investor warrant expense | - | (5,827 | ) | |||||
Non-compliance penalty for delinquent regular SEC filings | - | (220,864 | ) | |||||
Non-compliance penalty for SEC registration requirement | (36,016 | ) | (137,500 | ) | ||||
Total Other Expense | (1,406,939 | ) | (2,416,668 | ) | ||||
Net Loss | (3,097,732 | ) | (4,400,792 | ) | ||||
Dividend attributable to Series C shareholders | (754,900 | ) | (318,400 | ) | ||||
Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders | $ | (3,852,632 | ) | $ | (4,719,192 | ) | ||
Net Loss Per Share | ||||||||
- Basic and Diluted | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | ||
Weighted Average Number of | ||||||||
Common Shares Outstanding | ||||||||
- Basic and Diluted | 80,476,508 | 79,584,537 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
(unaudited)
Non | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible | Additional | Controlling | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred-A | Preferred-C | Common Stock | Paid-In | Accumulated | Interest | Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Deficit | Deficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance - December 31, 2016 | 11,000,000 | $ | 11,000 | 150,426 | $ | 150 | 80,476,508 | $ | 80,477 | $ | 63,999,315 | $ | (81,071,782 | ) | $ | (3,831,314 | ) | $ | (20,812,154 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | - | - | - | - | - | - | 35,961 | - | - | 35,961 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series C convertible preferred stock dividends: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrual of dividends earned | - | - | - | - | - | - | (754,900 | ) | - | - | (754,900 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (3,097,732 | ) | - | (3,097,732 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance - March 31, 2017 | 11,000,000 | $ | 11,000 | 150,426 | $ | 150 | 80,476,508 | $ | 80,477 | $ | 63,280,376 | $ | (84,169,514 | ) | $ | (3,831,314 | ) | $ | (24,628,825 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
For The Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (3,097,732 | ) | $ | (4,400,792 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 123,131 | 218,041 | ||||||
Accretion of interest expense | 75,872 | - | ||||||
Amortization of discount on convertible debt | 614,901 | - | ||||||
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities | 464,289 | 2,014,408 | ||||||
Provision for bad debt | 19,848 | 33,754 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | - | 2,831 | ||||||
Gain on settlement of accounts payable | (23,928 | ) | - | |||||
Non-compliance penalty for delinquent regular SEC filings | - | 220,864 | ||||||
Non-compliance penalty for SEC registration requirement | 36,016 | 137,500 | ||||||
Non-cash compensation: | ||||||||
Convertible preferred stock | - | 131,967 | ||||||
Common stock | 60,000 | 107,853 | ||||||
Options | 107,248 | 315,599 | ||||||
Warrants | - | 5,827 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable and other receivables | (61,719 | ) | (70,574 | ) | ||||
Inventory | 82,311 | 148,706 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (10,262 | ) | 155,573 | |||||
Other assets | 30,440 | 37,965 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 905,806 | 376,284 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | (109,356 | ) | (258,843 | ) | ||||
Total Adjustments | 2,314,597 | 3,577,755 | ||||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | (783,135 | ) | (823,037 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | ||||||||
Purchase of fixed assets | (206 | ) | (5,836 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (206 | ) | (5,836 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of shares of Series C Convertible | ||||||||
Preferred stock and warrants | - | 900,000 | ||||||
Payments of future public offering costs | (24,720 | ) | (45,000 | ) | ||||
Payments of debt issuance costs | (39,000 | ) | - | |||||
Bank overdrafts, net | (4,912 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of convertible note payable | 805,100 | - | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable to a related party | 47,567 | - | ||||||
Repayment of notes and convertible notes payable | (3,604 | ) | (23,434 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | 780,431 | 831,566 | ||||||
Net (Decrease) Increase In Cash | (2,910 | ) | 2,693 | |||||
Cash - Beginning of Period | 5,898 | 189,231 | ||||||
Cash - Ending of Period | $ | 2,988 | $ | 191,924 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Continued
(unaudited)
For The Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the years for: | ||||||||
Interest expense | $ | 44 | $ | 131 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
Return and retirement of common stock in connection with settlement | $ | - | $ | 45,000 | ||||
Issuance of common stock for services previously accrued | $ | - | $ | 20,991 | ||||
Accrual of contractual dividends on Series C Convertible Preferred Stock | $ | 754,900 | $ | 318,400 | ||||
Issuance of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in satisfaction of contractual dividends | $ | - | $ | (611,600 | ) | |||
Transfer of inventory to fixed assets | $ | 1,875 | $ | - | ||||
Warrants issued as debt discount in connection with issuances of notes payable | $ | 4,479 | $ | - | ||||
Accrual of deferred public offering costs | $ | 257,242 | $ | - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Car Charging Group, Inc. (“CCGI”) was incorporated on October 3, 2006 under the laws of the State of Nevada as New Image Concepts, Inc. On December 7, 2009, New Image Concepts, Inc. changed its name to Car Charging Group, Inc.
CCGI, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “Car Charging”), acquires and installs electric vehicle (“EV”) charging stations and shares servicing fees received from customers that use the charging stations with the property owner(s), on a property by property basis. In addition, the Company sells hardware and enters into individual arrangements for this purpose with various property owners, which may include municipalities, garage operators, hospitals, multi-family properties, shopping malls and facility owner/operators.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, such statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) which are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of March 31, 2017 and for the three months then ended. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year ending December 31, 2017 or any other period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related disclosures of the Company as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, which were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 10-K on April 14, 2017.
2. GOING CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT’S PLANS
As of March 31, 2017, the Company had a cash balance, a working capital deficiency and an accumulated deficit of $2,988, $18,989,258 and $84,169,514, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company incurred a net loss of $3,097,732. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within a year after the issuance date of this filing.
Since inception, the Company’s operations have primarily been funded through proceeds received in equity and debt financings. Although management believes that the Company has access to capital resources, there are currently no commitments in place for new financing at this time, except as described below, and there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain funds on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. There is also no assurance that the amount of funds the Company might raise will enable the Company to complete its development initiatives or attain profitable operations. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing on a timely basis, it may have to curtail its development, marketing and promotional activities, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, and ultimately the Company could be forced to discontinue its operations and liquidate.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern and the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment that might become necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company received an aggregate of $695,000 associated with the issuance of a convertible note payable. In addition, pursuant to a convertible note, an additional $999,900 of funding could be released to the Company upon the completion of certain contractually defined milestones. See Note 5 – Notes Payable – Convertible and Other and Notes and Note 10 – Subsequent Events – Convertible Note for additional details. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attaining the defined milestones. The Company is currently funding its operations on a month-to-month basis. While there can be no assurance that it will be successful, the Company is in active negotiations to raise additional capital.
8 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CCGI and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Car Charging, Inc., Beam Charging LLC (“Beam”), EV Pass LLC (“EV Pass”), Blink Network LLC (“Blink”) and Car Charging China Corp. (“Car Charging China”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Through April 16, 2014, 350 Green LLC (“350 Green”) was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company in which the Company had full voting control and was therefore consolidated. Beginning on April 17, 2014, when 350 Green’s assets and liabilities were transferred to a trust mortgage, 350 Green became a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”). The consolidation guidance relating to accounting for VIEs requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity and perform ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The Company determined that it is the primary beneficiary of 350 Green, and as such, 350 Green’s assets, liabilities and results of operations are included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
USE OF ESTIMATES
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, together with amounts disclosed in the related notes to the financial statements. The Company’s significant estimates used in these financial statements include, but are not limited to, stock-based compensation, accounts receivable reserves, warranty reserves, inventory valuations, the valuation allowance related to the Company’s deferred tax assets, the carrying amount of intangible assets, estimates of future EV sales and the effects thereon, derivative liabilities and the recoverability and useful lives of long-lived assets. Certain of the Company’s estimates could be affected by external conditions, including those unique to the Company and general economic conditions. It is reasonably possible that these external factors could have an effect on the Company’s estimates and could cause actual results to differ from those estimates.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are carried at their contractual amounts, less an estimate for uncollectible amounts. As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there was an allowance for uncollectable amounts of $19,848 and $42,349, respectively. Management estimates the allowance for bad debts based on existing economic conditions, the financial conditions of the customers, and the amount and age of past due accounts. Receivables are considered past due if full payment is not received by the contractual due date. Past due accounts are generally written off against the allowance for bad debts only after all collection attempts have been exhausted.
INVENTORIES
Inventory is comprised of electric charging stations and related parts, which are available for sale or for warranty requirements. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method. Inventory that is sold to third parties is included within cost of sales and inventory that is installed on the premises of participating owner/operator properties, where the Company retains ownership, is transferred to fixed assets at the carrying value of the inventory. The Company periodically reviews for slow-moving, excess or obsolete inventories. Products that are determined to be obsolete, if any, are written down to net realizable value. Based on the aforementioned periodic reviews, the Company recorded an inventory reserve for slow-moving, excess or obsolete inventories of $188,000 and $154,000 as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the Company’s inventory was comprised solely of finished goods and parts that are available for sale.
FIXED ASSETS
Fixed assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization which is recorded commencing at the in-service date using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Accumulated depreciation and amortization as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $4,870,795 and $4,726,861, respectively.
9 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets were acquired in conjunction with the acquisitions of Beam, EV Pass, and Blink during 2013 and were recorded at their fair value at such time. Trademarks are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful life of ten years. Patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the patent (twenty years or less), commencing when the patent is approved and placed in service on a straight-line basis. Accumulated amortization related to intangible assets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $36,339 and $33,759, respectively.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company evaluates its convertible instruments to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivative financial instruments to be separately accounted for in accordance with Topic 815 of the FASB ASC. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the conversion options and warrants at their fair values as of the inception date of the agreement and at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value is recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense for each reporting period at each balance sheet date. Conversion options are recorded as a discount to the host instrument and are amortized as interest expense over the life of the underlying instrument. The Company reassesses the classification of its derivative instruments at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of the event that caused the reclassification.
The Binomial Lattice Model was used to estimate the fair value of the warrants that are classified as derivative liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The model includes subjective input assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates. The expected volatility is estimated based on the most recent historical period of time equal to the weighted average life of the warrants.
SEQUENCING POLICY
Under ASC 815-40-35, the Company has adopted a sequencing policy whereby, in the event that reclassification of contracts from equity to assets or liabilities is necessary pursuant to ASC 815 due to the Company’s inability to demonstrate it has sufficient authorized shares, shares will be allocated on the basis of the earliest issuance date of potentially dilutive instruments, with the earliest grants receiving the first allocation of shares.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the guidance of ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 — quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
Level 3 — inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s notes payable approximates fair value because the effective yields on these obligations, which include contractual interest rates, taken together with other features such as concurrent issuance of warrants, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.
10 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Accordingly, when a customer completes use of a charging station, the service can be deemed rendered and revenue may be recognized based on the time duration of the session or kilowatt hours drawn during the session. Sales of EV stations are recognized upon shipment to the customer, free on board shipping point, or the point of customer acceptance.
Governmental grants and rebates pertaining to revenues and periodic expenses are recognized as income when the related revenue and/or periodic expense are recorded. Government grants and rebates related to EV charging stations and their installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the related depreciation expense of the related asset over their useful lives.
For arrangements with multiple elements, which is comprised of (1) a charging unit, (2) installation of the charging unit, (3) maintenance and (4) network fees, revenue is recognized dependent upon whether vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for separating each of the elements. The Company determined that VSOE exists for both the delivered and undelivered elements of the company’s multiple-element arrangements. The Company limited their assessment of fair value to either (a) the price charged when the same element is sold separately or (b) the price established by management having the relevant authority.
CONCENTRATIONS
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, revenues generated from Entity C represented approximately 10% and 13%, respectively, of the Company’s total revenue. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, revenues generated from Entity D represented approximately 16% of the Company’s total revenue. The Company generated charging service revenues from a customer (Entity C) and equipment sales revenue from a customer (Entity D). As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, accounts receivable from Entity C were 11% and 18%, respectively, of total accounts receivable.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current year presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported results of operations or loss per share.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company measures the cost of services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award. For employees, the fair value of the award is measured on the grant date and for non-employees, the fair value of the award is measured on the measurement date and re-measured on vesting dates and interim financial reporting dates until the service period is complete. The fair value amount is then recognized over the period during which services are required to be provided in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. Awards granted to non-employee directors for their service as a director are treated on the same basis as awards granted to employees. The Company computes the fair value of equity-classified warrants and options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
11 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – CONTINUED
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of vested common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number vested of common shares, plus the net impact of common shares (computed using the treasury stock method), if dilutive, resulting from the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants, plus the conversion of preferred stock and convertible notes.
The following common stock equivalents are excluded from the calculation of weighted average dilutive common shares because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
March 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Preferred stock | 53,264,425 | 50,635,502 | ||||||
Warrants | 55,900,882 | 57,881,213 | ||||||
Options | 7,411,668 | 7,700,000 | ||||||
Convertible notes | 850,107 | 50,983 | ||||||
Total potentially dilutive shares | 117,427,082 | 116,267,698 |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.
LITIGATION AND DISPUTES
The Company records legal costs associated with loss contingencies as incurred and accrues for all probable and estimable settlements.
4. ACCRUED EXPENSES
SUMMARY
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Registration rights penalty | $ | 1,003,944 | $ | 967,928 | ||||
Accrued consulting fees | 181,800 | 184,800 | ||||||
Accrued host fees | 1,395,650 | 1,308,897 | ||||||
Accrued professional, board and other fees | 1,447,629 | 1,381,399 | ||||||
Accrued wages | 230,000 | 241,466 | ||||||
Accrued commissions | 500,000 | 445,000 | ||||||
Warranty payable | 333,000 | 338,000 | ||||||
Accrued taxes payable | 556,687 | 511,902 | ||||||
Accrued payroll taxes payable | 246,818 | 122,069 | ||||||
Warrants payable | 202,980 | 155,412 | ||||||
Accrued issuable equity | 1,306,862 | 862,377 | ||||||
Accrued interest expense | 338,582 | 273,838 | ||||||
Accrued lease termination costs | 300,000 | - | ||||||
Accrued settlement reserve costs | 175,000 | - | ||||||
Dividend payable | 1,905,000 | 1,150,100 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses | 14,068 | 12,788 | ||||||
Total accrued expenses | $ | 10,138,020 | $ | 7,955,976 | ||||
Accrued expenses, net of current portion | 3,150,212 |
- | ||||||
Current portion of accrued expenses | $ | 6,987,808 |
$ | 7,955,976 |
12 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
4. ACCRUED EXPENSES - CONTINUED
REGISTRATION RIGHTS PENALTY
In connection with the sale of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company granted the purchasers certain registration rights. On November 7, 2016, the Company filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 but, as of March 31, 2017, the registration statement had not been declared effective by the SEC. The registration rights agreements entered into with the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock purchasers provide that the Company has to pay liquidated damages equal to 1% of all Series C subscription amounts received on the date the Series C resale registration statement was due to be filed pursuant to such registration rights agreements. The Company is required to pay such penalty each month thereafter until the resale registration statement is filed and once filed the Company has 30 days for the registration statement to be deemed effective otherwise the penalty resumes each month until the terms are met. The maximum liquidated damages amount is 10% of all Series C subscription amounts received. Failure to pay such liquidated damages results in interest on such damages at a rate of 18% per annum becoming due. As a result, the Company accrued $1,003,944 and $967,928 of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock registration rights damages at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company issued Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in satisfaction of the liability. See Note 10 – Subsequent Events - Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for additional details.
ACCRUED PROFESSIONAL, BOARD AND OTHER FEES
Accrued professional, board and other fees consist of investment banking fees, professional fees, bonuses, board of director fees, network fees, installation costs and other miscellaneous fees. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, accrued investment banking fees were $860,183, which were payable in cash.
ACCRUED COMMISSIONS
See Note 8 – Related Parties for additional details.
WARRANTY PAYABLE
The Company provides a limited product warranty against defects in materials and workmanship for its Blink residential and commercial chargers, ranging in length from one to two years. The Company accrues for estimated warranty costs at the time of revenue recognition and records the expense of such accrued liabilities as a component of cost of sales. Estimated warranty costs are based on historical product data and anticipated future costs. Should actual failure rates differ significantly from estimates, the impact of these unforeseen costs would be recorded as a change in estimate in the period identified. Warranty expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were $19,147 and $71,116, respectively.
ACCRUED ISSUABLE EQUITY
In connection with the issuance of a convertible note payable in 2016, the Company is obligated to issue to the purchaser shares of common stock equal to 48% of the consideration paid by the purchaser. The Company must issue such shares on the earlier of (i) the fifth (5th) trading day after the pricing of the Public Offering and (ii) May 15, 2017. As of March 31, 2017, the purchaser paid aggregate consideration of $1,805,100 to the Company but the Company had not yet issued the common stock to the purchaser. As a result, the Company accrued the $866,448 obligation. See Note 5 – Notes Payable – Convertible and Other Notes for additional details.
Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company issued 575,144 shares of common stock in satisfaction of $230,000 of the liability. See Note 10 – Subsequent Events - Common Stock for additional details.
RELEASE OF LIABILITY
On March 24, 2017, the Company was released from a $23,928 liability pursuant to a professional service agreement, such that it recognized a gain on forgiveness of accounts payable of $23,928 during the three months ended March 31, 2017.
ACCRUED LEASE TERMINATION COSTS
See Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies – Operating Lease for additional details.
13 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNAUDITED)
5. NOTES PAYABLE
CONVERTIBLE AND OTHER NOTES
Amendment of Promissory Note
With respect to the securities and purchase agreement dated October 7, 2016, on March 23, 2017, the parties agreed to amend the terms of the securities and purchase agreement and promissory note as follows:
The maturity date of the note is the earlier of May 15, 2017 or third business day after the closing of the Public Offering. Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the maturity date was extended to the earlier of June 15, 2017 or the third business day after the closing of the Public Offering. See Note 10 – Subsequent Events – Convertible Notes for additional details.
With respect to the Origination Shares, on the fifth (5th) trading day after the pricing of the Public Offering, but in no event later than May 15, 2017, or, if the Listing Approval End Date is February 28, 2017, in no event later than March 31, 2017, the Company shall deliver to the purchaser such number of duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable Origination Shares equal to 48% of the consideration paid by the purchaser, divided by the lowest of (i) $0.70 per share, or (ii) the lowest daily closing price of the common stock during the ten days prior to delivery of the Origination Shares (subject to adjustment for stock splits), or (iii) 80% of the common stock offering price of the Public Offering, or (iv) 80% of the unit price offering price of the Public Offering (if applicable), or (v) the exercise price of any warrants issued in the Public Offering. In the event that the Public Offering is not completed before May 15, 2017, so long as purchaser owns any of the Origination Shares at the time of a subsequent public offering where the pricing terms above would result in a lower Origination Share pricing, the Origination Shares pricing shall be subject to a reset based on the same above pricing terms (such that the Origination Shares issuance price would be reduced and the number of Origination Shares issued would be increased to equal the Origination Dollar Amount). Unless otherwise agreed by both parties, at no time will the Company issue to the purchaser such number of Origination Shares that would result in the purchaser owning more than 9.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding of the Issuer immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the Origination Shares.
The purchaser conditionally waives the defaults for the Company’s failure to meet the original maturity date of the note and delivery date for the Origination Shares, but the purchaser does not waive any damages, fees, penalties, liquidated damages, or other amounts or remedies otherwise resulting from such defaults (which damages, fees, penalties, liquidated damages, or other amounts or remedies the Investor may choose in the future to assess, apply or pursue in its sole discretion) and the purchaser’s conditional waiver is conditioned on the Company’s not being in default of and not breaching any term of the note or the securities purchase agreement or any other Transaction Documents (as defined in the securities purchase agreement) at any time subsequent to the date of the amendment. If the Company triggers an event of default or breaches any term of the note, the securities purchase agreement, or the Transaction Documents at any time subsequent to the date of the amendment, the purchaser may issue a notice of default for the Company’s failure to meet the original maturity date of the note and delivery date of the Origination Shares.
Issuances
With respect to the securities and purchase agreement dated October 7, 2016, as amended on March 23, 2017, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company received additional advances of an aggregate of $805,100 under the note, such that, as of March 31, 2017, an aggregate of $1,805,100 had been advanced to the Company by the purchaser. Pursuant to the terms of the securities purchase agreement, the Company is required to repay an aggregate of $856,856 to the purchaser in connection with the advances received during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The $51,756 difference between the principal amount and the cash received was recorded as debt discount and is being accreted to interest expense over the term of the note.
Pursuant to the terms of the note, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,150,142 shares of the Company’s common stock with an issuance date fair value of an aggregate of $44,795, which was recorded as a derivative liability. The aggregate exercise price of the warrants is $805,100. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had not issued the Origination Shares (as defined in the securities purchase agreement) associated with the advances to-date and, as a result, accrued for the $866,448 obligation as of March 31, 2017. See Note 4 – Accrued Expenses – Accrued Issuable Equity. The conversion option of the note was determined to be a derivative liability. The aggregate issuance date fair value of the warrants, Origination Shares, conversion option, placement agent fees and other issuance costs in connection with the advances during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $819,868, which was recorded as a debt discount against the principal amount of the note. The $18,213 of debt discount in excess of the principal was recognized immediately and the remaining $801,655 of debt discount is being recognized over the term of the note.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company made aggregate principal repayments of $3,604 associated with a non-convertible note payable.
14 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5. NOTES PAYABLE - CONTINUED
CONVERTIBLE AND OTHER NOTES - RELATED PARTY
As of the date of filing, convertible notes payable to a company wholly-owned by the Company’s Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors with an aggregate principal amount of $495,000 were outstanding and were past due. The Company has not satisfied this debt and is in negotiations with the Executive Chairman to extend the maturity dates of such notes. On November 14, 2016, the Company received notices of default with respect to notes payable to a company wholly-owned by the Executive Chairman with an aggregate principal balance of $410,000 which included demands for payment of the outstanding principal and interest within seven days. As of the date of filing there have been no further developments in respect to the demand for payment on these notes payable.
On February 10, 2017, the Company issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $22,567, to a company in which the Company’s Executive Chairman has a controlling interest, which bears interest at 10% per annum payable upon maturity. The promissory note is payable on the earlier of May 9, 2017, or the closing date of a public offering of the Company’s securities, which raises gross proceeds of at least $10,000,000. This note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or premium. As of the date of filing, the note is past due. The Company has not satisfied this debt and is in negotiations with the Executive Chairman to extend the maturity dates of such notes.
On February 14, 2017, the Company issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $25,000, to a company in which the Company’s Executive Chairman has a controlling interest, which bears interest at 10% per annum payable upon maturity. The promissory note is payable on the earlier of May 15, 2017, or the closing date of a public offering of the Company’s securities, which raises gross proceeds of at least $10,000,000. This note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or premium. As of the date of filing, the note is past due. The Company has not satisfied this debt and is in negotiations with the Executive Chairman to extend the maturity dates of such notes.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $140,661 and $35,238, respectively.
15 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
See Note 4 – Accrued Expenses – Warrants Payable for additional details associated with issuance costs which included an obligation to issue investment banker warrants. See Note 5 – Notes Payable – Convertible and Other Notes for warrants classified as derivative liabilities that were issued in connection with a convertible note.
Assumptions utilized in the valuation of Level 3 liabilities are described as follows:
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.47 - 1.50 | % | 0.87% - 1.16 | % | ||||
Expected term (years) | 1.53 - 5.00 | 2.53 - 4.28 | ||||||
Expected volatility | 149% - 155 | % | 114% - 119 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of Level 3 warrant liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Derivative Liabilities | ||||
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2017 | $ | 1,583,103 | ||
Issuance of warrants | 334,487 | |||
Change in fair value of derivative liability | 421,200 | |||
Ending balance as of March 31, 2017 | $ | 2,338,790 | ||
Warrants Payable | ||||
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2017 | $ | 155,412 | ||
Provision for new warrant issuances | - | |||
Accrual of other warrant obligations | 4,479 | |||
Change in fair value of warrants payable | 42,486 | |||
Ending balance as of March 31, 2017 | $ | 202,377 |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are as follows:
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,338,790 | $ | 2,338,790 | ||||||||
Warrants Payable | - | - | 202,377 | 202,377 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,541,167 | $ | 2,541,167 |
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,583,103 | $ | 1,583,103 | ||||||||
Warrants payable | - | - | 155,412 | 155,412 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,738,515 | $ | 1,738,515 |
16 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
7. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
PREFERRED STOCK
SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shall have no liquidation preference so long as the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock shall be outstanding.
SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
On December 31, 2016, the Company received a notice of redemption from the creditors committee of the ECOtality estate to redeem 2,750 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock for $275,000. As of March 31, 2017, the redemption amount remained outstanding. The Company has the option to settle the redemption request either by the repayment in cash or by the issuance of shares of common stock.
As of March 31, 2017, the liquidation preference for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock amounted to $825,000.
SERIES C CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a dividend payable liability on the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of $1,905,000 and $1,150,100, respectively. See Note 4 – Accrued Expenses. Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company issued Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in satisfaction of the liability. See Note 10 – Subsequent Events - Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for additional details.
In the event of a liquidation, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is also entitled to a liquidation preference equal to the stated value plus any accrued and unpaid dividends, which, as of March 31, 2017, was equal to $16,947,600.
NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS
350 Green is not owned by the Company but is deemed to be a VIE where the entirety of its results of operations are consolidated in the Company’s financial statements.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to preferred stock, common stock, stock options and warrants for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 of $167,248 and $561,246, respectively, which is included within compensation expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of March 31, 2017, there was $30,947 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that will be recognized over the weighted average remaining vesting period of 0.25 years.
17 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
8. RELATED PARTIES
See Note 5 - Notes Payable – Convertible and Other Notes – Related Party.
A company owned by its Executive Chairman, such company is referred to as “FGI”, and the Company’s Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) have made certain claims for historical unpaid compensation pursuant to their Fee/Commission Agreements with the Company. During November 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors quantified the total claims to be approximately $475,000 for each party and, upon further analysis, determined the Company’s reasonable estimate of the aggregate liability is $500,000 (estimated as $375,000 payable in cash and $125,000 payable in stock options). The Company’s Board of Directors continues to investigate this claim, but has not reached any conclusions or new estimates of the aggregate liability. The estimated aggregate liability of $500,000 was accrued and is included within accrued expenses on the condensed balance sheet as of March 31, 2017. See Note 4 – Accrued Expenses.
In addition, FGI has made a claim that expired warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,733,335 shares of common stock should be replaced pursuant to an agreement with the Company. As of March 31, 2017, the fair value of the warrant claim is estimated to be approximately $686,000. The Company’s Board of Directors is currently investigating this claim, but at this time, the range of possible settlement amounts ranges from $0 to $686,000, with no amount being more likely than another amount. Accordingly, the Company has not made any accrual for a settlement of this claim as of March 31, 2017.
On February 7, 2017, a company in which the Company’s Executive Chairman has a controlling interest purchased the following securities from a stockholder of the Company for $1,000,000: 7,142,857 shares of common stock, 114,491 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, warrants to purchase 26,230,176 shares of the Company’s common stock, and all rights, claims, title, and interests in any securities of whatever kind or nature issued or issuable as a result of the stockholder’s ownership of the Company’s securities.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
OPERATING LEASE
On February 28, 2017, the Company vacated the Phoenix, Arizona space and has no further obligation in connection with the sublease.
Total rent expense, net of sublease income, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $56,548 and $79,871, respectively, and is recorded in other operating expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
On March 20, 2017, in connection with the Company’s Miami Beach, Florida lease, the Company’s landlord filed a complaint for eviction with the Miami-Dade County Court against the Company as a result of the Company’s default under the lease for failing to pay rent, operating expenses and sales taxes of approximately $175,000, which represents the Company’s obligations under the lease through March 31, 2017, which was accrued for as of March 31, 2017. As a result of the action taken by the landlord, as of March 31, 2017, the Company accrued an additional $300,000, which represents the fair value of the Company’s rent obligation through the end of the lease.
TAXES
The Company has not filed its Federal and State corporate income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015. The Company has sustained losses for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015. The Company has determined that no tax liability, other than required minimums, has been incurred.
The Company is also delinquent in filing and, in certain instances, paying sales taxes collected from customers in specific states that impose a tax on sales of the Company’s products. The Company has accrued an approximate $216,000 liability as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 related to this matter.
The Company is currently delinquent in remitting approximately $247,000 and $244,000 as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, of federal and state payroll taxes withheld from employees. On March 29, 2017, the Company sent a letter to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) notifying the IRS of its intention to resolve the delinquent taxes upon the receipt of additional working capital.
18 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES – CONTINUED
LITIGATION AND DISPUTES
On July 28, 2015, a Notice of Arbitration was received stating ITT Cannon has a dispute with Blink for the manufacturing and purchase of 6,500 charging cables by Blink, which had not taken delivery or made payment on the contract price of $737,425. ITT Cannon also seeks to be paid the cost of attorney’s fees as well as punitive damages. The Company contends that the product was not in accordance with the specifications in the purchase order and, as such, believes the claim is without merit. The parties have agreed on a single arbitrator. The arbitration hearing is currently scheduled for July 26, 2017 through July 28, 2017. The parties began initial depositions in February and will continue through the period leading to the arbitration hearing. In parallel however, the parties had settlement discussions on February 28, 2017. As of May 8, 2017, settlement agreement drafts have been exchanged between Blink, Car Charging and ITT reflecting stock valued at $200,000 and, as a result, the Company accrued for the liability as of March 31, 2017. The amount of shares will be determined and priced on the day of closing of our contemplated public offering. For this, ITT would relinquish to Car Charging all of the remaining inventory of the EV charging cable assemblies originally valued at $737,425. Typical stock restrictions and/or stock bleed out agreements may be imposed affecting the final settlement figure. On May 10, 2017, the parties had a case management conference in which they informed the arbitrator that they are attempting to settle the case.
On April 8, 2016, Douglas Stein filed a Petition for Fee Arbitration with the State Bar of Georgia against the Company for breach of contract for failure to pay invoices in the amount of $178,893 for legal work provided. The invoices have been accrued for in the periods in which the services were provided. The Company has responded to the claim and is simultaneously pursuing settlement options. The parties failed to settle after numerous attempts. On February 15, 2017, the case was brought to the Georgia Arbitration Committee. On February 26, 2017, The Stein Law firm was awarded a summary judgment for $178,893. The Company may appeal the decision and/or offer stock and/or cash in exchange for the awarded judgment at a later date.
On May 18, 2016, the Company was served with a complaint from Solomon Edwards Group, LLC for breach of written agreement and unjust enrichment for failure to pay invoices in the amount of $172,645 for services provided, plus interest and costs. The invoices have been accrued for in the periods in which the services were provided. The Company has responded to the claim and is simultaneously pursuing settlement options. Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company issued 364,061 shares of common stock to Solomon Edwards Group, LLC in partial satisfaction of the past due amount, which amount is included in Note 10 – Subsequent Events –Common Stock.
From time to time, the Company is a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions that arise in the normal course of business.
350 GREEN, LLC
350 Green lawsuits relate solely to alleged pre-acquisition unpaid debts of 350 Green. Also, there are other unpaid creditors, aside from those noted above, that claim to be owed certain amounts for pre-acquisition work done on behalf of 350 Green solely, that potentially could file lawsuits at some point in the future.
On August 7, 2014, 350 Green received a copy of a complaint filed by Sheetz, a former vendor of 350 Green alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment of $112,500. The complaint names 350 Green, 350 Holdings LLC and CCGI in separate breach of contract counts and names all three entities together in an unjust enrichment claim. CCGI and 350 Holdings will seek to be dismissed from the litigation, because, as the complaint is currently plead, there is no legal basis to hold CCGI or 350 Green liable for a contract to which they are not parties. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, an amount of $112,500 is included in accounts payable of 350 Green. The parties held a mediation conference on May 15, 2015, but no settlement was reached. The Company settled with Sheetz in principal on February 10, 2017 with the formal documentation being signed on March 1, 2017. The settlement involved a combination of DC charging equipment, installation, charging services, shared driver charging revenue and maintenance for two systems in exchange for no further legal action amongst 350 Holdings or the Company.
On September 9, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit of Chicago, Illinois affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the matter of JNS Power & Control Systems, Inc. v. 350 Green, LLC in favor of JNS, which affirmed the sale of certain assets by 350 Green to JNS and the assumption of certain 350 Green liabilities by JNS. On April 7, 2016, JNS amended the complaint to add the Company alleging an unspecified amount of lost revenues from the chargers, among other matters, caused by the defendants. Plaintiff also seeks indemnity for its unspecified costs in connection with enforcing the Asset Purchase Agreement in courts in New York and Chicago. On April 28, 2017, the parties concluded their efforts to mediate a settlement before Magistrate Judge Kim without achieving a settlement. Settlement discussions are ongoing between the parties. The next status hearing on the matter is set for May 31, 2017.
19 |
CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
CONVERTIBLE NOTES
Issuances
With respect to the securities and purchase agreement dated October 7, 2016, as amended on March 23, 2017 and May 15, 2017, subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company received additional advances of an aggregate of $695,000 under the note. Pursuant to the terms of the note, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 992,856 shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate exercise price of $695,000.
Amendment of Promissory Note
With respect to the securities and purchase agreement dated October 7, 2016, as amended on March 23, 2017, on May 15, 2017, the parties agreed to amend the terms of the securities and purchase agreement and promissory note as follows:
The maturity date of the note is the earlier of June 15, 2017 or third business day after the closing of the Public Offering.
With respect to the Origination Shares, on the fifth (5th) trading day after the pricing of the Public Offering, but in no event later than June 15, 2017, the Company shall deliver to the purchaser such number of duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable Origination Shares equal to 48% of the consideration paid by the purchaser, divided by the lowest of (i) $0.70 per share, or (ii) the lowest daily closing price of the common stock during the ten days prior to delivery of the Origination Shares (subject to adjustment for stock splits), or (iii) 80% of the common stock offering price of the Public Offering, or (iv) 80% of the unit price offering price of the Public Offering (if applicable), or (v) the exercise price of any warrants issued in the Public Offering. In the event that the Public Offering is not completed before June 15, 2017, so long as purchaser owns any of the Origination Shares at the time of a subsequent public offering where the pricing terms above would result in a lower Origination Share pricing, the Origination Shares pricing shall be subject to a reset based on the same above pricing terms (such that the Origination Shares issuance price would be reduced and the number of Origination Shares issued would be increased to equal the Origination Dollar Amount). Unless otherwise agreed by both parties, at no time will the Company issue to the purchaser such number of Origination Shares that would result in the purchaser owning more than 9.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding of the Issuer immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the Origination Shares.
The purchaser conditionally waives the defaults for the Company’s failure to meet the original and previously amended maturity date of the note and delivery date for the Origination Shares, but the purchaser does not waive any damages, fees, penalties, liquidated damages, or other amounts or remedies otherwise resulting from such defaults (which damages, fees, penalties, liquidated damages, or other amounts or remedies the Investor may choose in the future to assess, apply or pursue in its sole discretion) and the purchaser’s conditional waiver is conditioned on the Company’s not being in default of and not breaching any term of the note or the securities purchase agreement or any other Transaction Documents (as defined in the securities purchase agreement) at any time subsequent to the date of the amendment. If the Company triggers an event of default or breaches any term of the note, the securities purchase agreement, or the Transaction Documents at any time subsequent to the date of the amendment, the purchaser may issue a notice of default for the Company’s failure to meet the original maturity date of the note and delivery date of the Origination Shares.
SERIES C CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 61,740 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in satisfaction of aggregate liabilities of approximately $6,200,000 associated with the Company’s registration rights penalty, public information fee and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock dividends.
COMMON STOCK
Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,058,314 shares of common stock in satisfaction of aggregate liabilities of $386,900 associated with certain professional and other consulting fee agreements.
EXCHANGE OF WARRANTS AND SERIES C CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company sent out letters to various holders of warrants and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock that contained an offer for the holder to (i) exchange their exiting warrants for common stock of the Company and (ii) exchange their existing Series C Preferred Stock for common stock of the Company. As of the date of filing, holders had agreed to (i) exchange warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,285,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate of 2,285,000 shares of common stock (the “Warrant Exchange”) and (ii) exchange an aggregate of 6,811 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for common stock based upon a formula defined in the agreement (the “Series C Preferred Stock Exchange”). The Warrant Exchange is effective immediately and the Series C Preferred Stock Exchange is effective upon closing of the Public Offering. The Series C Preferred Stock shall be exchanged for common stock using the following formula: the number of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock owned multiplied by a factor of 115 and divided by 80% of the price per share of common stock sold in the in the Public Offering. The holders also agreed to not, without prior written consent of the underwriter, sell or otherwise transfer any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into common stock for a period of 270 days from the effective date of the Series C Preferred Stock Exchange. As of the date of filing, the Company had not issued the common stock in connection with Warrant Exchange.
20 |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of Car Charging Group, Inc. (and, including its subsidiaries, “CarCharging”, “CCGI”, “the Company”) as of March 31, 2017 and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. References in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to “us”, “we”, “our” and similar terms refer to CarCharging. This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. The events described in forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report may not occur. Generally, these statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of our plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits from acquisitions to be made by us, or projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings or other aspects of our operating results. The words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” and “continue,” and their opposites and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are beyond our control, which may influence the accuracy of the statements and the projections upon which the statements are based. Factors that may affect our results include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q particularly in Item IA - Risk Factors.
Any one or more of these uncertainties, risks and other influences could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate. Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are a leading owner, operator, and provider of electric vehicle (“EV”) charging equipment and networked EV charging services. We offer both residential and commercial EV charging equipment, enabling EV drivers to easily recharge at various location types.
Our principal line of products and services is our Blink EV charging network (the “Blink Network”) and EV charging equipment (also known as electric vehicle supply equipment) and EV related services. Our Blink Network is proprietary cloud-based software that operates, maintains, and tracks all of the Blink EV charging stations and the associated charging data. The Blink Network provides property owners, managers, and parking companies, who we refer to as our Property Partners, with cloud-based services that enable the remote monitoring and management of EV charging stations, payment processing, and provide EV drivers with vital station information including station location, availability, and applicable fees.
We offer our Property Partners a flexible range of business models for EV charging equipment and services. In our comprehensive and turnkey business model, we own and operate the EV charging equipment, manage the installation, maintenance, and related services, and share a portion of the EV charging revenue with the property owner. Alternatively, Property Partners may share in the equipment and installation expenses, with CarCharging operating and managing the EV charging stations and providing connectivity to the Blink Network. For Property Partners interested in purchasing and owning EV charging stations that they manage, we can also provide EV charging hardware, site recommendations, connectivity to the Blink Network, and service and maintenance services.
As reflected in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2017, we had had a cash balance, a working capital deficiency and an accumulated deficit of $2,988, $18,989,258 and $84,169,514, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we incurred a net loss of $3,097,732. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, as expressed in the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements. Historically, we have been able to raise funds to support our business operations, although there can be no assurance we will be successful.
Through April 16, 2014, 350 Green was our wholly-owned subsidiary in which we had full control and the Company was consolidated. Beginning on April 17, 2014, when 350 Green’s assets and liabilities were transferred to a trust mortgage, 350 Green became a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”). The consolidation guidance relating to accounting for VIEs requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity and perform ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. We determined that our Company is the primary beneficiary of 350 Green, and as such, 350 Green’s assets, liabilities and results of operations are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
21 |
Consolidated Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared With March 31 Ended March 31, 2016
Revenues
Total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $595,620 compared to $840,137, a decline of $244,517, or 29%. The decline is primarily attributed to a $136,618, or 47%, decline in product sales that decreased to $153,587 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to $290,205 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower volume of residential and commercial units sold during the three months ended March 31, 2017. In addition, the decline is attributed to a $66,970, or 29%, decline in grants and rebates revenue that decreased to $32,810 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to $99,780 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Grants and rebates relating to equipment and the related installation are deferred and amortized in a manner consistent with the depreciation expense of the related assets over their useful lives. The ability to secure grant revenues is typically unpredictable and, therefore, uncertain. However, historically, the Company has secured and depended on incentives and intends to continue to pursue incentives from various governmental jurisdictions. As an example, the Company endorsed the Obama Administration’s announcement of, among other things, programs to release up to $4.5 billion in loan guarantees and invite applications to support the deployment of commercial EV charging facilities, and launch the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (“FAST”) Act process to identify and develop corridors for zero emission and alternative fuel vehicles, which will include a network of EV fast charging stations.
Charging service revenue company-owned charging stations was $267,874 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to $292,743 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, a slight decrease of $24,869, or 8%. Charging services derived from revenue company-owned charging stations increased, despite a $54,099 decrease in revenue from a program sponsored by Nissan North America that the Company has participated in since July 2014. The Program Coordinator pays the Company based on the number of program participants and the percentage of DC Fast Chargers in the program. Starting in July 2015, the private company participating in this program began adding chargers to the program and we no longer were able to generate as much revenue from the percentage of chargers we have in the program. We expect revenues derived from this program during the balance of 2017 to continue to be lower than the revenues we derived from this program in the same periods in 2016.
Total revenue from warranty revenue, network fees and other revenue was $141,349 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $157,409 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, a decrease of $16,060, or 10%. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in non-company-owned fee-generating units on our network during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, partially offset by an increase in maintenance contracts entered into by the Company as compared to the prior period.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues primarily consists of depreciation of installed charging stations, amortization of the Blink Network infrastructure, the cost of charging station goods and related services sold, repairs and maintenance, electricity reimbursements and revenue share payments to hosts when we are the primary obligor in the revenue share arrangement. Cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were $432,407 as compared to $746,775 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease of $158,032, or 50%, in total cost of revenues in connection with cost of charging services, host provider fees and cost of product sales primarily due to a decrease in charging service revenues and equipment sales, with margins remaining consistent as compared to the prior period, as well as a reduction in depreciation and amortization expense that declined to $112,153 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $202,104 for the three months ended March 31, 2016, as the underlying assets became fully depreciated since the 2016 period. There is a degree of variability in our gross margins related to charging services revenues from period to period primarily due to (i) the mix of revenue share payment arrangements, (ii) electricity reimbursements, and (iii) the costs of maintaining charging stations not currently in operation. Any variability in our gross margins related to equipment sales depends on the mix of products sold.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consist of selling, marketing, advertising, payroll, administrative, finance and professional expenses.
Compensation expense decreased by $466,422, or 32%, from $1,463,779 (consisting of approximately $0.9 million of cash compensation and approximately $0.6 million of non-cash compensation) for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $997,357 (consisting of approximately $0.8 million of cash compensation and approximately $0.2 million of non-cash compensation) for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily attributable reduced payroll expenses of approximately $180,000 due to the departure of certain management and other personnel during the second half of 2016 and a reduction in non-cash compensation of approximately $400,000 (which includes a $201,000 reduction of stock-based compensation expense related to share-based payments made to our Chief Operating Officer during the three months ended March 31, 2016 under the terms of his employment agreement.)
22 |
Other operating expenses consist primarily of rent, travel and IT expenses. Other operating expenses decreased by $101,862, or 30%, from $344,803 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $242,941 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily attributable to decreased call center expenses as the Company inaugurated their own internal call center in Phoenix, Arizona during 2016 and reduced travel and third party IT expenses as compared to the prior period.
General and administrative expenses increased by $44,804, or 17%, from $268,904 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $313,708 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to increased legal and consulting fees as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, partially offset by a general reduction in other expenditures due to cash constraints.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we incurred lease termination costs of $300,000 which represents the fair value of our remaining under our lease agreement.
Other Expense
Other expense decreased by $1,006,898, or 42%, from $2,416,668 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $1,406,939 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the change of the fair value of warrant liabilities of $1,550,119, or 77%, from $2,014,408 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to $464,289 for the three months ended March 31, 2017, partially offset by an increase in amortization of discount on convertible notes of $614,901
Net Loss
Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2017 decreased by $1,303,060, or 30%, to $3,097,732 as compared to $4,400,792 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in operating expenses of $223,480 and other expenses of $1,006,898, partially offset by an increase in gross profit of $69,851. Our net loss attributable to common shareholders for the three months ended March 31, 2017 decreased by $866,560, or 18%, from $4,719,192 to $3,852,632 for the aforementioned reasons and due to an increase in the dividend attributable to Series C Convertible Preferred shareholders of $436,500.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we financed our activities from proceeds derived from debt and equity financing. A significant portion of the funds raised from the sale of capital stock have been used to cover working capital needs and personnel, office expenses and various consulting and professional fees.
For the three ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we used cash of $783,135 and $823,037, respectively, in operations. Our cash use for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was primarily attributable to our net loss of $3,097,732, adjusted for net non-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $1,477,377, partially offset by $837,220 of net cash provided by changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities. Our cash use for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was primarily attributable to our net loss of $4,400,792, adjusted for net non-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $3,188,644 partially offset by $389,111 of net cash provided by changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, cash used in investing activities was $206, which was used to purchase charger cables. Net cash used in investing activities was $5,836 during the three months ended March 31, 2016, which was used to purchase office and computer equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $780,431, of which $805,100 was provided in connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable and $47,567 was provided in connection with proceeds from the issuance of notes payable to a related party, partially offset by $24,720 of payment of future offering costs, $39,000 of payment of debt issuance costs, repayment of notes payable of $3,604 and $4,912 of net cash used in connection with bank overdrafts. Cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $831,566 of which $855,000 of net proceeds (gross proceeds of 900,000 less cash issuance costs of $45,000) were from the sale of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants, partially offset by the repayment of notes payable of $23,434.
We expect that through the next 12 months from the date of this filing, we will require external funding to sustain operations and to follow through on the execution of our business plan. There can be no assurance that our plans will materialize and/or that we will be successful in our efforts to obtain the funding to cover working capital shortfalls. Given these conditions, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and our future is contingent upon our ability to secure the levels of debt or equity capital we need to meet our cash requirements. In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered by entrants into established markets, the competitive environment in which we operate and the current capital raising environment.
23 |
Since inception, our operations have primarily been funded through proceeds from equity and debt financings. Although management believes that we have access to capital resources, there are currently no commitments in place for new financing at this time, except as described above under the heading Recent Developments, and there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain funds on commercially acceptable terms, if at all.
We intend to raise additional funds during the next twelve months. The additional capital raised would be used to fund our operations. The current level of cash and operating margins is insufficient to cover our existing fixed and variable obligations, so increased revenue performance and the addition of capital through issuances of securities are critical to our success. Should we not be able to raise additional debt or equity capital through a private placement or some other financing source, we would take one or more of the following actions to conserve cash: further reductions in employee headcount, reduction in base salaries to senior executives and employees, and other cost reduction measures. Assuming that we are successful in our growth plans and development efforts, we believe that we will be able to raise additional debt or equity capital. There is no guarantee that we will be able to raise such additional funds on acceptable terms, if at all.
Through March 31, 2017, we incurred an accumulated deficit since inception of $84,169,514. As of March 31, 2017, we had a cash balance and working capital deficit of $2,988 and $18,989,258, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we incurred a net loss of $3,097,732. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the issuance date of this filing.
Our condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.
Securities Purchase Agreement with JMJ Financial
In accordance with its terms, the purchase agreement with JMJ (the “Purchase Agreement”) became effective upon (i) execution by the Parties of the Purchase Agreement, a note, and a warrant, and (ii) delivery of an initial advance pursuant to the note of $500,000, which occurred on October 13, 2016. The note and warrant were issued on October 13, 2016. We are currently planning to conduct an underwritten public offering of our securities for which we have filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, on December 21, 2016 (the “Registered Offering”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, as amended on March 23, 2017 and May 15, 2017, JMJ purchased from our Company (i) a Promissory Note in the aggregate principal amount of up to $3,725,000 due and payable on the earlier of June 15, 2017 or the third business day after the closing of the Registered Offering, and (ii) a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase 714,285 shares of our common stock at an exercise price per share equal to the lesser of (i) 80% of the per share price in the contemplated Registered Offering, (ii) $0.70 per share, (iii) 80% of the unit price in the Registered Offering (if applicable), (iv) the exercise price of any warrants issued in the Registered Offering, or (v) the lowest conversion price, exercise price, or exchange price, of any security issued by us that is outstanding on October 13, 2016. The aggregate exercise price is $500,000. Pursuant to the terms of the note, JMJ has agreed that it will not convert the note into more than 9.99% of our outstanding shares. JMJ currently does not own any shares of our common stock.
On the fifth (5th) trading day after the pricing of our contemplated public offering, but in no event later than June 15, 2017, we will deliver to JMJ the Origination Shares.
The initial amount borrowed under the note was $500,000, with the remaining amounts permitted to be borrowed under the note being subject to us achieving certain milestones. With the achievement of certain milestones in November 2016, an additional advance of $500,000 occurred on November 28, 2016. Another warrant to purchase 714,285 shares of our common stock was issued as of November 28, 2016. With the achievement of certain milestones in February 2017, additional advances of $225,100 and $300,000 occurred on, respectively, February 10, 2017 and February 27, 2017. Thus, two more warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock were issued, one for 321,571 shares and the other for 428,571 shares, respectively. With the achievement of certain milestones in March 2017, additional advances of $250,000 and $30,000 occurred on March 14, 2017 and March 24, 2017, respectively, and two more warrants to purchase the Company's common stock were issued, one for 357,143 shares and the other for 42,857 shares. With the achievement of certain milestones in April 2017, an additional advance of $400,000 occurred on April 5, 2017 and another warrant to purchase 571,428 shares of our common stock was issued on the same date. With the achievement of certain milestones in May 2017, an additional advance of $295,000 occurred on May 9, 2017 and another warrant to purchase 421,428 shares of our common stock was issued on the same date.
24 |
In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a Representations and Warranties Agreement with JMJ regarding the Company’s existing debt as of October 13, 2016. The Company agreed to obtain agreements, by December 15, 2016, with holders owning at least $7,000,000 of the outstanding liabilities as reflected on the Company’s balance sheet as of June 30, 2016, providing for those holders to convert their liabilities into shares of Series C Preferred Stock or common stock of the Company at or prior to the time of the closing of the Registered Offering. The Company agreed to also, by December 15, 2016, to seek agreements so that the Company would not have, other than securities issued to JMJ, have any variable securities. The Company is still seeking these conversion agreements. Although the Company did not meet the December 2016 deadline, JMJ has not sought any remedies or assessed any fees for such failure.
Critical Accounting Policies
There are no material changes from the critical accounting policies set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on April 14, 2017. Please refer to that document for disclosures regarding the critical accounting policies related to our business.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are not required to provide the information required by this Item because we are a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2016. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
25 |
Based on our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses described below.
1. | We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us for the year ended December 31, 2016. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness. | |
2. | We do not have sufficient resources in our accounting function, which restricts the Company’s ability to gather, analyze and properly review information related to financial reporting in a timely manner. In addition, due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness. | |
3. | We do not have personnel with sufficient experience with United States generally accepted accounting principles to address complex transactions. | |
4. | We have inadequate controls to ensure that information necessary to properly record transactions is adequately communicated on a timely basis from non-financial personnel to those responsible for financial reporting. Management evaluated the impact of the lack of timely communication between non–financial personnel and financial personnel on our assessment of our reporting controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency represented a material weakness. | |
5. | We have determined that oversight over our external financial reporting and internal control over our financial reporting by our Board of Directors is ineffective. The Board of Directors has not provided adequate review of the Company’s SEC’s filings and condensed consolidated financial statements and has not provided adequate supervision and review of the Company’s accounting personnel or oversight of the independent registered accounting firm’s audit of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statement. |
We have taken steps to remediate some of the weaknesses described above, including by engaging a financial reporting advisor with expertise in accounting for complex transactions. We intend to continue to address these weaknesses as resources permit.
Notwithstanding the assessment that our ICFR was not effective and that there are material weaknesses as identified herein, we believe that our condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods covered thereby in all material respects.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
26 |
There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our Company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our Company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our Company’s or our Company’s subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect with the exception of the foregoing:
350 GREEN, LLC
There have been five lawsuits filed against 350 Green by creditors of 350 Green regarding unpaid claims. These lawsuits relate solely to alleged pre-acquisition unpaid debts of 350 Green. Also, there are other unpaid creditors, aside from those noted above, that claim to be owed certain amounts for pre-acquisition work done on behalf of 350 Green solely, that potentially could file lawsuits at some point in the future.
On August 7, 2014, 350 Green received a copy of a complaint filed by Sheetz, a former vendor of 350 Green alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment of $112,500. The complaint names 350 Green, 350 Holdings LLC and the Company in separate breach of contract counts and names all three entities together in an unjust enrichment claim. The Company and 350 Holdings will seek to be dismissed from the litigation, because, as the complaint is currently plead, there is no legal basis to hold the Company or 350 Green liable for a contract to which they are not parties. As of March 31, 2017, and 2016, an amount of $112,500 is included in accounts payable of 350 Green. The parties held a mediation conference on May 15, 2015, but no settlement was reached. The Company settled with Sheetz in principal on February 10, 2017 with the formal documentation being signed on March 1, 2017. The settlement involved a combination of DC charging equipment, installation, charging services, shared driver charging revenue and maintenance for two systems in exchange for no further legal action between 350 Holdings or the Company.
LITIGATION UPDATES
On July 28, 2015, a Notice of Arbitration was received stating ITT Cannon has a dispute with Blink for the manufacturing and purchase of 6,500 charging cables by Blink, which had not taken delivery or made payment on the contract price of $737,425. ITT Cannon also seeks to be paid the cost of attorney’s fees as well as punitive damages. The Company contends that the product was not in accordance with the specifications in the purchase order and, as such, believes the claim is without merit. The parties have agreed on a single arbitrator. The arbitration hearing is currently scheduled for July 26, 2017 through July 28, 2017. The parties began initial depositions in February and will continue through the period leading to the arbitration hearing. In parallel however, the parties had settlement discussions on February 28, 2017. As of May 8, 2017, settlement agreement drafts have been exchanged between Blink, Car Charging and ITT reflecting stock valued at $200,000 and, as a result, the Company accrued for the liability as of March 31, 2017. The amount of shares will be determined and priced on the day of closing of our contemplated public offering. For this, ITT would relinquish to Car Charging all of the remaining inventory of the EV charging cable assemblies originally valued at $737,425. Typical stock restrictions and/or stock bleed out agreements may be imposed affecting the final settlement figure. On May 10, 2017, the parties had a case management conference in which they informed the arbitrator that they are attempting to settle the case.
On April 8, 2016, Douglas Stein filed a Petition for Fee Arbitration with the State Bar of Georgia against the Company for breach of contract for failure to pay invoices in the amount of $178,893 for legal work provided. The invoices have been accrued for in the periods in which the services were provided. The Company has responded to the claim and is simultaneously pursuing settlement options. The parties failed to settle after numerous attempts. On February 15, 2017, the case was brought to the Georgia Arbitration Committee. On February 26, 2017, The Stein Law firm was awarded a summary judgment for $178,893. The Company may appeal the decision and/or offer stock and/or cash in exchange for the awarded judgment at a later date.
On May 18, 2016, the Company was served with a complaint from Solomon Edwards Group, LLC for breach of written agreement and unjust enrichment for failure to pay invoices in the amount of $172,645 for services provided, plus interest and costs. The invoices have been accrued for in the periods in which the services were provided. The Company has responded to the claim and is simultaneously pursuing settlement options. Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company issued 364,061 shares of common stock to Solomon Edwards Group, LLC in partial satisfaction of the past due amount.
On September 9, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit of Chicago, Illinois affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the matter of JNS Power & Control Systems, Inc. v. 350 Green, LLC in favor of JNS, which affirmed the sale of certain assets by 350 Green to JNS and the assumption of certain 350 Green liabilities by JNS. On April 7, 2016, JNS amended the complaint to add the Company alleging an unspecified amount of lost revenues from the chargers, among other matters, caused by the defendants. Plaintiff also seeks indemnity for its unspecified costs in connection with enforcing the Asset Purchase Agreement in courts in New York and Chicago. On April 28, 2017, the parties concluded their efforts to mediate a settlement before Magistrate Judge Kim without achieving a settlement. Settlement discussions are ongoing between the parties. The next status hearing on the matter is set for May 31, 2017.
27 |
The Company has identified the following material change to the risk factors discussed in Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K which was filed with the SEC on April 14, 2017.
Computer Malware, Viruses, Hacking, Phishing Attacks and Spamming Could Harm Our Business and Results of Operations.
Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in our services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. Computer malware, viruses, computer hacking and phishing attacks against online networking platforms have become more prevalent and may occur on our systems in the future.
Any attempts by hackers to disrupt our website service or our internal systems, if successful, could harm our business, be expensive to remedy and damage our reputation or brand. Our network security business disruption insurance may not be sufficient to cover significant expenses and losses related to direct attacks on our website or internal systems. Efforts to prevent hackers from entering our computer systems are expensive to implement and may limit the functionality of our services. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of our products and services and technical infrastructure may harm our reputation, brand and our ability to attract customers. Any significant disruption to our website or internal computer systems could result in a loss of customers and could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We have previously experienced, and may in the future experience, service disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, third-party service providers, human or software errors and capacity constraints. If our mobile application is unavailable when customers attempt to access it or it does not load as quickly as they expect, customers may seek other services.
Our platform functions on software that is highly technical and complex and may now or in the future contain undetected errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Some errors in our software code may only be discovered after the code has been deployed. Any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities discovered in our code after deployment, inability to identify the cause or causes of performance problems within an acceptable period of time or difficultly maintaining and improving the performance of our platform, particularly during peak usage times, could result in damage to our reputation or brand, loss of revenues, or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
We expect to continue to make significant investments to maintain and improve the availability of our platform and to enable rapid releases of new features and products. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems as needed and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business and operating results may be harmed.
We have a disaster recovery program to transition our operating platform and data to a failover location in the event of a catastrophe and have tested this capability under controlled circumstances, however, there are several factors ranging from human error to data corruption that could materially lengthen the time our platform is partially or fully unavailable to our user base as a result of the transition. If our platform is unavailable for a significant period of time as a result of such a transition, especially during peak periods, we could suffer damage to our reputation or brand, or loss of revenues any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Growing our customer base depends upon the effective operation of our mobile applications with mobile operating systems, networks and standards that we do not control.
We are dependent on the interoperability of our mobile applications with popular mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Google's Android and iOS, and any changes in such systems that degrade our products’ functionality or give preferential treatment to competitive products could adversely affect the usage of our applications on mobile devices. Additionally, in order to deliver high quality mobile products, it is important that our products work well with a range of mobile technologies, systems, networks and standards that we do not control. We may not be successful in developing relationships with key participants in the mobile industry or in developing products that operate effectively with these technologies, systems, networks or standards.
We are Required to Register Under the Securities Act the Resale of Shares of Our Common Stock by a Number of Our Security Holders. Our Failure to Comply With Our Contractual Obligations and Timely Register the Resale of Any Shares of Our Common Stock Has Resulted in, and Will Result in, Among Other Things, the Payment of Liquidated Damages, And Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Ability to Raise Additional Funds Through Private Placements in The Future And Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business.
28 |
We have entered into various agreements with purchasers of our securities from time to time which require us to register under the Securities Act the resale of shares of our common stock that we have issued or will be required to issue to such purchasers. We had failed to perform our obligations under these agreements and had accrued registration rights penalties, inclusive of accrued interest, in an aggregate amount equal to $1,245,212 as of March 31, 2017. On May 8, 2017, the Company issued a total of 61,740 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to forty-eight (48) stockholders as payment, among other items, of these registration rights penalties.
These additional issuances of securities had a dilutive effect on our other stockholders. In addition, our failure to timely register the resale of any shares of our common stock may result in reputational harm for our Company and could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise additional funds through private placements in the future, which may have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are Required to Enable Some of our Shareholders to Sell Shares of Our Common Stock Pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. Our Failure to Comply With Our Contractual Obligations and Enable Such Sales Has Resulted in, and Will Result in, Among Other Things, the Payment of Liquidated Damages, And Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Ability to Raise Additional Funds Through Private Placements in The Future And Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business.
We have entered into various agreements with purchasers of our securities from time to time which require us to enable sales of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act by filing our 10-Ks and 10-Qs in a timely fashion. Until we became current in our filings in August 2016, we had failed to perform our obligations under these agreements and have accrued public information failure rights penalties in an aggregate amount equal to $3,005,277, inclusive of accrued interest, as of March 31, 2017. The payment of these penalties will adversely impact our working capital. On May 8, 2017, the Company issued a total of 61,740 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to forty-eight (48) stockholders as payment, among other item, of these public information failure rights penalties.
These additional issuances of securities had a dilutive effect on our other stockholders. In addition, our failure to timely file our 10-Qs and 10-Ks may result in reputational harm for our Company and could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise additional funds through private placements in the future, which may have a material adverse effect on our business.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with JMJ, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company received additional advances of an aggregate of $805,100 under the Promissory Note and the Company issued five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,150,142 shares of the Company’s common stock. The aggregate exercise price of the warrants is $805,100.
The above securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. These securities qualified for exemption under Section 4(a)(2) since the issuance by us did not involve a public offering. The offerings were not “public offerings” as defined in 4(a)(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the transactions, manner of the issuance and number of securities issued. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of securities to a high number of investors. In addition, the investors had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(a)(2) since they agreed to and received securities bearing a legend stating that such securities are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Act. This restriction ensures that these securities would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for these transactions
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
As of November 14, 2016, convertible notes with a principal value of $295,000 held by a company wholly-owned by Mr. Farkas discussed under Item 2 have matured and are more than 30 days past due (the “Past Due Notes”). We have not satisfied this debt. On November 14, the Company received notices of default from the company wholly-owned by Mr. Farkas with regard to the Past Due Notes as well as additional convertible notes with a principal value of $115,000 that are not yet 30 days past due. The Company plans on seeking to negotiate with the company wholly-owned by Mr. Farkas to extend the maturity dates of all past due notes. If we are unable to do so on favorable terms, or at all, the company wholly-owned by Mr. Farkas could seek to enforce the notes against us, which could have an adverse effect on our business and reduce the market price of our common stock.
On February 10, 2017, the Company issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $22,567, to a company in which the Company’s Executive Chairman has a controlling interest, which bears interest at 10% per annum payable upon maturity. The promissory note is payable on the earlier of May 9, 2017, or the closing date of a public offering of the Company’s securities, which raises gross proceeds of at least $10,000,000. This note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or premium. As of the date of filing, the note is past due. The Company has not satisfied this debt and is in negotiations with the Executive Chairman to extend the maturity dates of such notes.
29 |
On February 14, 2017, the Company issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $25,000, to a company in which the Company’s Executive Chairman has a controlling interest, which bears interest at 10% per annum payable upon maturity. The promissory note is payable on the earlier of May 15, 2017, or the closing date of a public offering of the Company’s securities, which raises gross proceeds of at least $10,000,000. This note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or premium. As of the date of filing, the note is past due. The Company has not satisfied this debt and is in negotiations with the Executive Chairman to extend the maturity dates of such notes.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
With respect to the Purchase Agreement with JMJ Financial dated October 7, 2016, as amended on March 23, 2017, on May 15, 2017, the parties agreed to amend the terms of the securities and Purchase Agreement and promissory note as follows:
The maturity date of the note is the earlier of June 15, 2017 or third business day after the closing of the Registered Offering.
With respect to the Origination Shares, on the fifth (5th) trading day after the pricing of the Registered Offering, but in no event later than June 15, 2017, the Company shall deliver to the purchaser such number of duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable Origination Shares equal to 48% of the consideration paid by the purchaser, divided by the lowest of (i) $0.70 per share, or (ii) the lowest daily closing price of the common stock during the ten days prior to delivery of the Origination Shares (subject to adjustment for stock splits), or (iii) 80% of the common stock offering price of the Registered Offering, or (iv) 80% of the unit price offering price of the Registered Offering (if applicable), or (v) the exercise price of any warrants issued in the Registered Offering. In the event that the Registered Offering is not completed before June 15, 2017, so long as purchaser owns any of the Origination Shares at the time of a subsequent public offering where the pricing terms above would result in a lower Origination Share pricing, the Origination Shares pricing shall be subject to a reset based on the same above pricing terms (such that the Origination Shares issuance price would be reduced and the number of Origination Shares issued would be increased to equal the Origination Dollar Amount). Unless otherwise agreed by both parties, at no time will the Company issue to the purchaser such number of Origination Shares that would result in the purchaser owning more than 9.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding of the Issuer immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the Origination Shares.
The purchaser conditionally waives the defaults for the Company’s failure to meet the original and previously amended maturity date of the note and delivery date for the Origination Shares, but the purchaser does not waive any damages, fees, penalties, liquidated damages, or other amounts or remedies otherwise resulting from such defaults (which damages, fees, penalties, liquidated damages, or other amounts or remedies the Investor may choose in the future to assess, apply or pursue in its sole discretion) and the purchaser’s conditional waiver is conditioned on the Company’s not being in default of and not breaching any term of the note or the securities purchase agreement or any other Transaction Documents (as defined in the securities purchase agreement) at any time subsequent to the date of the amendment. If the Company triggers an event of default or breaches any term of the note, the securities purchase agreement, or the Transaction Documents at any time subsequent to the date of the amendment, the purchaser may issue a notice of default for the Company’s failure to meet the original maturity date of the note and delivery date of the Origination Shares.
Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On May 8, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 61,740 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to forty-eight (48) existing holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in satisfaction of aggregate liabilities of approximately $6,200,000 associated with the Company’s registration rights penalty, public information fee and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock dividends.
These securities were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), but qualified for exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The securities were exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act because the issuance of such securities by the Company did not involve a “public offering,” as defined in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, due to the size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of securities offered. The Company issued these shares pursuant to previous agreements with the existing holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. The investors had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act since they agreed to, and will receive, share certificates bearing a legend stating that such securities are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these securities would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed
or Furnished |
|||||||||
Number | Exhibit Description | Form | Exhibit | Filing Date | Herewith | ||||||
10.1 | Amendment #1 to the Securities Purchase Agreement, between JMJ Financial and the Company, dated March 23, 2017 | 10-K | 10.26 | 04/14/2017 | |||||||
10.2 | Form of Promissory Note Issued by the Company to BLNK Holdings LLC | 10-K | 10.27 | 04/14/2017 | |||||||
10.3 | Amendment #2 to the Securities Purchase Agreement, between JMJ Financial and the Company, dated May 15, 2017 |
X | |||||||||
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | |||||||||
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | |||||||||
32.1* | Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | |||||||||
32.2* | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | |||||||||
101.INS | XBRL Instance. | X | |||||||||
101.XSD | XBRL Schema. | X | |||||||||
101.PRE | XBRL Presentation. | X | |||||||||
101.CAL | XBRL Calculation. | X | |||||||||
101.DEF | XBRL Definition. | X | |||||||||
101.LAB | XBRL Label. | X |
* In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed
30 |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 15, 2017 | CAR CHARGING GROUP, INC. |
By: | /s/ Michael J. Calise | |
Michael J. Calise | ||
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Interim Principal Financial Officer) |
31 |